2007
DOI: 10.1021/nl0709017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Charge Sensitivity of Silicon Nanowires:  Size Dependence

Abstract: Silicon nanowires of different widths were fabricated in silicon on insulator (SOI) material using conventional process technology combined with electron-beam lithography. The aim was to analyze the size dependence of the sensitivity of such nanowires for biomolecule detection and for other sensor applications. Results from electrical characterization of the nanowires show a threshold voltage increasing with decreasing width. When immersed in an acidic buffer solution, smaller nanowires exhibit large conductan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
224
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
9
224
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the conductivity of undoped or lowdoped GaAs and other semiconductor NWs-that is expected to undergo substantial changes with decreasing width and in the presence of surface charges on the side walls [16]-can barely be characterized by conventional transport measurements. Chemical modifications of the surface are another poorly controlled factor that influences the transport properties, since these differ for NWs made of different compound semiconductors [6,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the conductivity of undoped or lowdoped GaAs and other semiconductor NWs-that is expected to undergo substantial changes with decreasing width and in the presence of surface charges on the side walls [16]-can barely be characterized by conventional transport measurements. Chemical modifications of the surface are another poorly controlled factor that influences the transport properties, since these differ for NWs made of different compound semiconductors [6,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of such nanostructures is justified by the belief that nanoscale biosensors are more sensitive, with sensitivity defined as the relative change in drain current or a shift in threshold voltage in response to a change in bound biomolecule density. A few experiments specifically studied the effect of shrinking nanowire radii on sensitivity, albeit with varying structures, analytes, and sensing circumstances, and found that shrinking a sensor's dimensions indeed improves its sensitivity (4)(5)(6). The enhanced sensitivity has been loosely attributed to the increase in the sensor's surface area-to-volume ratio, which is a direct result of shrinking its dimensions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nanotubes and nanowires) are of low cost and can be integrated into micro-structures to form nanodevices. Existing wafer-scale nanotube/nanowire integration methods, such as directed assembly [15], contact printing [16], and dielectrophoresis [17] are inexpensive; however, they are incapable of precisely controlling nanostructure parameters, such as the number nanostructures and nanostructure size, which influence device performance [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. This results in a large device-to-device variability as their performance is mainly dependent on these nanostructure parameters.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These nanostructure attributes have been shown in nanowire electrical transport studies [18,19], gas-phase chemical sensing [20,21], aqueous sensing of pH and ionic species [22,23], and nanoribbon FETs [24,25] to influence device performance. Therefore these nanowire/nanotube integration methods will result in devices with higher device-to-device variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%