2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-005-9000-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface chemical analysis of raw cotton fibres and associated materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
72
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
8
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are in agreement with earlier studies of cellulosic materials (Soignet et al 1976;Ahmed et al 1987;Gellerstedt and Gatenholm 1999;Johansson et al 2004;Fras et al 2005;Mitchell et al 2005) and the well known fact that laminar layers of waxes, proteins and pectin, which originally more or less totally conceal the cellulose backbone, cover natural cotton fibers. It was shown by (Buchert et al 2001) that total removal of these ''natural passivation layers'' is very difficult indeed.…”
Section: Surface Chemical Effectssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are in agreement with earlier studies of cellulosic materials (Soignet et al 1976;Ahmed et al 1987;Gellerstedt and Gatenholm 1999;Johansson et al 2004;Fras et al 2005;Mitchell et al 2005) and the well known fact that laminar layers of waxes, proteins and pectin, which originally more or less totally conceal the cellulose backbone, cover natural cotton fibers. It was shown by (Buchert et al 2001) that total removal of these ''natural passivation layers'' is very difficult indeed.…”
Section: Surface Chemical Effectssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It was shown by (Buchert et al 2001) that total removal of these ''natural passivation layers'' is very difficult indeed. A minimum surface concentration of non-cellulosic compounds is 10-20% even in ''pure'' cellulose materials (Ahmed et al 1987;Belgacem et al 1995;Buchert et al 2001;Mitchell et al 2005) attributed to non-removable impurities. Since the waxes consist mainly of C1 type carbon, calculated relative amount of C1 component can be taken as an indicator of their presence at the fiber surface.…”
Section: Surface Chemical Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XPS and staining of different components of non-cellulosic substances of fibers with appropriate dyes are the methods for determination, the composition and the structure of the cuticle [12,32,33,[38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Xps and Dyeing Of The Non-cellulosic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed analysis of the oxygen (O1s) peak is generally less useful. The chemical shifts of carbon (C1s) in cotton fibers are deconvoluted into four sub-peaks classified into four categories [38,40]: C1, (unoxidised carbon C-C characteristic for waxes), C2 (carbon with one oxygen bond C-O), C3 (carbon with two oxygen bonds C-O-C or C=O, both characteristic for cellulose), and C4 (carbon with three oxygen bonds O=C-O, characteristic for pectin).…”
Section: Xps and Dyeing Of The Non-cellulosic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques that reduce the hydrophilicity of fiber materials include chemical modification (Mitchell et al 2005;Dankovich and Hsieh 2007;Devi and Maji 2012), compositing with hydrophobic polymers (Yang et al 2012), inorganic fillers (Chen et al 2010), and plasma treatment (Poaty et al 2013). However, chemical modification usually consumes a lot of energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%