2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface complexation modeling of the removal of arsenic from ion-exchange waste brines with ferric chloride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Durinfg the removal process, Macroporous strong-based anion exchange resin D296 has 2 maximum poifnts: at pH 5 with arsenic removal rate up to 63.4%, and at pH 8 with arsenic removal rate up to 52.1%; for Zr-D401 enzymatic hydrolyzate, the arsenic removal rate is up to 67.7% at pH 8, and at this pH the arsenic removal rate of Zr-D401 is higher than any other pH condition. Similar results have been reported: optimum pH range was found between 4−6 by An et al (2011) and between 4.5−6.5 by Pakzadeh and Batista (2011) by using the method of ion-exchange. Biswas et al (2008) reported that arsenate was strongly adsorbed in the pH range from 2 to 6, while arsenite was strongly adsorbed between pH 9 and 10 by Zr (IV)-loaded orange waste gel through the removal of As (V) and As (III).…”
Section: Effect Of Ph On the Removal Of Arsenic By D296supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Durinfg the removal process, Macroporous strong-based anion exchange resin D296 has 2 maximum poifnts: at pH 5 with arsenic removal rate up to 63.4%, and at pH 8 with arsenic removal rate up to 52.1%; for Zr-D401 enzymatic hydrolyzate, the arsenic removal rate is up to 67.7% at pH 8, and at this pH the arsenic removal rate of Zr-D401 is higher than any other pH condition. Similar results have been reported: optimum pH range was found between 4−6 by An et al (2011) and between 4.5−6.5 by Pakzadeh and Batista (2011) by using the method of ion-exchange. Biswas et al (2008) reported that arsenate was strongly adsorbed in the pH range from 2 to 6, while arsenite was strongly adsorbed between pH 9 and 10 by Zr (IV)-loaded orange waste gel through the removal of As (V) and As (III).…”
Section: Effect Of Ph On the Removal Of Arsenic By D296supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Surface complexation modeling (SCM) techniques such as the charge distribution multi-site complexation (CD-MUSIC) [76,95,[98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106], the extended triple-layer model [107], isotherm modeling [108,109], and the ligand and charge distribution model (LCD) [110,111] have been used to model As species in solution and adsorbed to mineral surfaces. In general, SCM models use experimental data or quantum mechanics results such as equilibrium constants, bond lengths, and surface charges to calculate the adsorption isotherms of As on Fe mineral surfaces.…”
Section: Studying As Adsorption With Mathematical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Siegel and Clifford () demonstrated that sodium sulfite, ferrous sulfate, and hydrazine are all capable of removing Cr(VI) from SBA exchange brines, but found that only ferrous sulfate can do so effectively without pH adjustment (Siegel & Clifford ). Pakzadeh and Batista (, ) studied the effects of pH, initial Cr(VI) concentration, reductant dosage, and several other factors on RCF treatment with calcium polysulfide (Pakzadeh & Batista ). They found that pH, oxidation–reduction potential, and calcium polysulfide dose had a large effect on the process.…”
Section: Previous Studies Of Reduction–coagulation–filtration In Stromentioning
confidence: 99%