2016
DOI: 10.1121/1.4961200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface contributions to scattered sound power using non-negative intensity

Abstract: Non-negative intensity is used to identify the surface areas of a structure that contributes to the scattered sound power. In the acoustic near field, the scattered sound power is predicted using non-negative intensity, as well as the scattered acoustic intensity integrated directly over the scatterer's surface area. In the acoustic far field, the scattered acoustic intensity and the scattered sound power are evaluated for three different receiver surface areas, corresponding to a sphere representing a far-fie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By introducing a discrete radiation model and an associated resistance matrix, the sound power level and radiation efficiency of the MMABH plate can be computed, following the steps in [22,61]. Finally, to determine which regions of the MMABH surface are responsible for the far-field sound radiation, we will resort to non-negative intensity (NNI) [62][63][64][65] as an alternative to supersonic intensity analysis [22,66,67] because of ease of implementation and slightly better performance at low frequecnies [68]. The paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By introducing a discrete radiation model and an associated resistance matrix, the sound power level and radiation efficiency of the MMABH plate can be computed, following the steps in [22,61]. Finally, to determine which regions of the MMABH surface are responsible for the far-field sound radiation, we will resort to non-negative intensity (NNI) [62][63][64][65] as an alternative to supersonic intensity analysis [22,66,67] because of ease of implementation and slightly better performance at low frequecnies [68]. The paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of validation, the approach proposed is compared with a reference calculation on an academic test case consisting of the scattering of an acoustic plane wave by a rigid sphere in an infinite water medium. This test case has been chosen because it has been deeply studied in the past (see for instance in [36][37][38]) and constitutes a reference for the study of the acoustic scattering by naval structures. Moreover, in the future, it could be easily upgraded to study the scattering of spheres coated by a soft rubber material [39,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that the results obtained using the useful intensity were not strictly the same as those obtained using the SSI. The NNI based on the BEM was also employed to identify the surface areas of a rigid sphere and a rigid cylinder that contributes to the scattered sound power [12]. The same technique was applied to localize the surface areas of vibrating structure to radiated sound power [13; 14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%