2011
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface convection and red-giant radius measurements

Abstract: Phenomenological models of convection adopt characteristic length scales that are chosen to fit solar or stellar observations. We investigate whether changes in these length scales are required between the Sun and low mass stars on the red giant branch (RGB). The question is addressed jointly in the frameworks of the mixing length theory and the full spectrum of turbulence model. For both models, the convective length scale is assumed to be a fixed fraction of the local pressure scale height. We use constraint… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find good agreement for all stars for both methods, with a residual mean of −2 ± 2% and +2 ± 2% for (V −K) and IRFM, respectively, both with a scatter of 5%. Our results therefore seem to confirm that the relation of Kervella et al (2004) is also valid for red giants, as suggested by Piau et al (2011), and that combining the IRFM method with asteroseismic constraints, as done by Silva Aguirre et al (2012), yields accurate diameters for both evolved and unevolved stars.…”
Section: Interferometrysupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We find good agreement for all stars for both methods, with a residual mean of −2 ± 2% and +2 ± 2% for (V −K) and IRFM, respectively, both with a scatter of 5%. Our results therefore seem to confirm that the relation of Kervella et al (2004) is also valid for red giants, as suggested by Piau et al (2011), and that combining the IRFM method with asteroseismic constraints, as done by Silva Aguirre et al (2012), yields accurate diameters for both evolved and unevolved stars.…”
Section: Interferometrysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Examples include the improvement of model physics of stellar structure and evolution such as convection (see, e.g., Demarque et al 1986;Monteiro et al 1996;Deheuvels & Michel 2011;Trampedach & Stein 2011;Piau et al 2011), the calibration of empirical relations such as the color-temperature scale for cool stars (see, e.g., Flower 1996;Ramírez & Meléndez 2005;Casagrande et al 2010), and the characterization of physical Notes. Stars are separated into main-sequence and subgiant stars (top) and red giants (bottom).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of a magnetic field strength of 1200 G at the bottom of the simulation compatible with the strength of the toroidal field at 0.996 R extracted by Baldner et al (2009) from the seismic observations collected by the Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI; Scherrer et al 1995) on board SoHO, slightly reduces the turbulence and leads to a small decrease in the solar radius of dozens of kilometers at the surface (Piau et al 2011). The l = 0 radial differences at the high-frequency range extracted from the GOLF observations (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We also note that there is no reason throughout the whole evolution of the star to assume a constant value of α (see e.g., Siess & Livio 1997;Piau et al 2011, and references therein). In this respect, the progresses in 2D and 3D radiative hydrodynamical simulations of convection in the past decade (Ludwig et al 1999;Trampedach et al 1999;Trampedach 2007) provided evidence of both variations in α, which can depends on both T eff and log g, and the possibility of theoretically calibrating the mixing length parameter (see also .…”
Section: Convectionmentioning
confidence: 99%