1960
DOI: 10.1149/1.2427688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Coverage during Hydrogen and Oxygen Evolution

Abstract: The relation between surface coverage and electrode potential during hydrogen and oxygen evolution was studied with inert electrodes of very large surface area. Desorption of gas after interruption of current was followed with micro-volumetric techniques and overvoltage decay was measured simultaneously. The steady-state overvoltage varied linearly with the total amount of hydrogen or oxygen evolved after interruption of current. The true surface area of the electrodes was determined by the BET method, and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1960
1960
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The oxygen evolved at constant temperature and pressure was measured as a function of time simultaneously with the decay of potential. The experimental set-up for this study has been described recently (17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oxygen evolved at constant temperature and pressure was measured as a function of time simultaneously with the decay of potential. The experimental set-up for this study has been described recently (17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxygen evolution on nickel electrodes in alkaline solution may be accompanied by adsorption proc-esses (of intermediate OH-and O2H-, and of atomic and molecular oxygen) and by the formation of surface oxides. This has been discussed with respect to the surface coverage on inert electrodes by Ruetschi and co-workers (8). The presence of other adsorbed species during hydrogen evolution has been considered possible but otherwise has been largely ignored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 and consider only the changes of the ion concentration at the end of on-time and off-time of each single pulse. So, when we let t ϭ mT (m ϭ 1, 2, 3 .....) [32] Eq. 17 becomes [33] When m is very large, we can make the following approximation [34] And we can obtain Figure 8.…”
Section: Mass Transfer Of O Atoms In Pulse Charge-many Authors Havementioning
confidence: 99%