“…Possibly more insidious, even at 6 cm only 31% of patients have experienced complications suggesting that many large aneurysms are resected that might have remained stable Contents lists available at ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jbiomech www.JBiomech.com for the patient's lifetime (Chau and Elefteriades, 2013;Polzer et al, 2013;Sundt, 2013). To move towards the ideal case of patient specific risk assessments, several biomechanical criteria have been explored for aortic aneurysms including wall stress (Fillinger et al, 2003;Gasser et al, 2010;Raut et al, 2013a;Vande Geest et al, 2006a), over-pressure (Martin et al, 2013), and non-diameter shape based criteria (Lee et al, 2013;Raut et al, 2013a;Shum et al, 2011). In fact, for abdominal aortic aneurysms, the peak wall stress was shown to estimate patient risk with a higher accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity than the diameter criterion alone (Fillinger et al, 2003).…”