2007
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.20494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface damage induced by FIB milling and imaging of biological samples is controllable

Abstract: Focused ion beam (FIB) techniques are among the most important tools for the nanostructuring of surfaces. We used the FIB/SEM (scanning electron microscope) for milling and imaging of digestive gland cells. The aim of our study was to document the interactions of FIB with the surface of the biological sample during FIB investigation, to identify the classes of artifacts, and to test procedures that could induce the quality of FIB milled sections by reducing the artifacts. The digestive gland cells were prepare… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If AuNPs detected in transmission mode were not detected on the surface, we proceeded to search inside the cell by performing a cut using FIB milling. Before the cut, and in order to protect the region of the cell containing the AuNPs and avoid the curtain effect (formation of striations across the milling face when the sample has a surface with uneven topography), we deposited a protective metallic layer on top using Pt-GIS activated with the electron gun (the preparation of the cut is shown in Figure 2 F highlighting the deposition with artificial shadowing) 19 . The cut was made using the smallest aperture of our FIB at 1.5 pA current to avoid damage caused by the FIB to the cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If AuNPs detected in transmission mode were not detected on the surface, we proceeded to search inside the cell by performing a cut using FIB milling. Before the cut, and in order to protect the region of the cell containing the AuNPs and avoid the curtain effect (formation of striations across the milling face when the sample has a surface with uneven topography), we deposited a protective metallic layer on top using Pt-GIS activated with the electron gun (the preparation of the cut is shown in Figure 2 F highlighting the deposition with artificial shadowing) 19 . The cut was made using the smallest aperture of our FIB at 1.5 pA current to avoid damage caused by the FIB to the cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After drying, the cells were mounted on aluminum stubs and coated with gold by magnetron sputtering (Bal-Tec SCD 050 sputter coater). The samples were analyzed with an FEI Strata DB 235 M scanning electron microscope or a Sirion 400 NC focused-ion-beam/scanning electron microscope (17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drobne et al, as well as other authors, extensively described the potential of FIB milling to process biological samples and shed light on the optimal processing parameters in order to avoid shrinkage, melting effect, Ga + implantation or side-wall artefacts. 18,[27][28][29][30] These effects can be effectively reduced by a first Pt layer deposition which protects the sample surface against re-deposition of ablated atoms, provides mechanical stability and reduces curtain effects. In addition, damage can be minimized by working with low ion beam currents and low acceleration voltages, especially during the final steps of the crosssection polishing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%