2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2cp00100d
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface-dependent band structure variations and bond deviations of GaN

Abstract: Density functional theory (DFT) calculations on tunable number of GaN (0001) planes give invariant band structure, density of states (DOS) diagram, and band gap of GaN unit cell. Dissimilar band...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

7
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, Ag 2 O crystals show an opposite facet-related photocatalytic activity trend . These facet-dependent observations can be understood to arise from the presence of a face-specific surface layer with slight variations in atom positions from bond length and direction deviations, leading to changes in the charge transfer ability across different crystal surfaces. Initial X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis on Cu 2 O and SrTiO 3 polyhedra supports the existence of such slight lattice deviations between the surface and the crystal bulk. , In fact, the band structure of a crystal surface can be tuned through conjugated molecular functionalization, making Cu 2 O cubes possess an excellent photocatalytic activity. Upon light absorption by semiconductor crystals to generate conduction band electrons and valence band holes, the electrons migrate to the crystal surface and reduce dissolved oxygen to form superoxide anion radicals (O 2 •– ), while holes oxidize water/hydroxide to give hydroxyl radicals ( • OH) . The radicals then decompose organic molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Interestingly, Ag 2 O crystals show an opposite facet-related photocatalytic activity trend . These facet-dependent observations can be understood to arise from the presence of a face-specific surface layer with slight variations in atom positions from bond length and direction deviations, leading to changes in the charge transfer ability across different crystal surfaces. Initial X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis on Cu 2 O and SrTiO 3 polyhedra supports the existence of such slight lattice deviations between the surface and the crystal bulk. , In fact, the band structure of a crystal surface can be tuned through conjugated molecular functionalization, making Cu 2 O cubes possess an excellent photocatalytic activity. Upon light absorption by semiconductor crystals to generate conduction band electrons and valence band holes, the electrons migrate to the crystal surface and reduce dissolved oxygen to form superoxide anion radicals (O 2 •– ), while holes oxidize water/hydroxide to give hydroxyl radicals ( • OH) . The radicals then decompose organic molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[7][8][9][10][11] Density functional theory calculations have suggested that there is a facet-specific surface layer with variations in bond length and bond direction causing the surface band structure changes. [12][13][14] Thus, different surfaces should have dissimilar barriers to charge transport to produce the electrical facet dependence. Surface trap states may also be related to the electrical facet effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19][20] These facet-dependent behaviors, as revealed by density functional theory (DFT) calculations on Cu 2 O, Si, Ge, GaAs and GaN, result from the presence of a thin surface layer with dissimilar band structures for different surface planes. 5,[21][22][23][24][25] The band structure changes are linked to slight deviations in bond length and bond direction within the surface layer. [21][22][23][24][25] This surface layer naturally accounts for the observation of facet-related absorption and emission band shifts in various semiconductor nanocrystals including Cu 2 O, SrTiO 3 , CsPbX 3 and Ag 2 O.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,[21][22][23][24][25] The band structure changes are linked to slight deviations in bond length and bond direction within the surface layer. [21][22][23][24][25] This surface layer naturally accounts for the observation of facet-related absorption and emission band shifts in various semiconductor nanocrystals including Cu 2 O, SrTiO 3 , CsPbX 3 and Ag 2 O. 2,19,[26][27][28][29] In addition to the optical facet effect, the absorption band, and hence band gap, can shift continuously from quantum nanostructures to very large particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%