2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.09.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface dilational moduli of latex-particle monolayers spread at air–water interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(26 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the rheological response is strongly dependent on the region of the 2D phase diagram analyzed [18,120]. was found to be larger than along the entire phase diagram of the system, and the behavior was independent of the strain rate for experiments performed at fixed frequencies [121]. A small hysteresis, associated with the loss connection between the particles, was found for these systems.…”
Section: Dilational Rheologymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In this case, the rheological response is strongly dependent on the region of the 2D phase diagram analyzed [18,120]. was found to be larger than along the entire phase diagram of the system, and the behavior was independent of the strain rate for experiments performed at fixed frequencies [121]. A small hysteresis, associated with the loss connection between the particles, was found for these systems.…”
Section: Dilational Rheologymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…If local equilibrium is assumed, then the system should exhibit reversible dynamics in the compression/expansion cycles. In particular, the experiments carried out by Hilles et al (2007) show that the oscillatory motions of the barriers lead to hysteresis cycles, whose area increases with the strain amplitude; see also the experimental results by Kato and Kawaguchi (2012) and Kobayashi and Kawaguchi (2013). This irreversible behavior is sometimes attributed to non-equilibrium effects related to physico-chemical properties of the surfactant, like for example phase-changes in the monolayer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Equations (25)-(27) apply in the limit co ~ 1, which is relevant in some experimental runs (Kato andKawaguchi 2012, Kobayashi andKawaguchi 2013) and will be pursued elsewhere. Here, instead, we further simplify these equations, concentrating in the limit ««1,…”
Section: /|~«L 2 /5««~m-(3dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, above a threshold value of the interfacial coverage, a steep decrease of the viscoelastic moduli occurs due to the possible distortion of the quasi-2D layer, appearing as the buckling of the monolayer. Such systems present a transition between a fluid-like behavior to a solid-like behaviour with the densification of the interface [69,139,140]. Therefore, we assume that the dilational rheological response is strongly dependent on the specific region of the phase diagram under study [73].…”
Section: Dilational Rheologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we assume that the dilational rheological response is strongly dependent on the specific region of the phase diagram under study [73]. For polymeric particles, the storage modulus was higher than the loss modulus within the entire interfacial coverage range, with this behavior being independent on the stain rate [139]. For low interfacial densities, the elastic component increases with the interfacial coverage due to the presence of repulsive interactions.…”
Section: Dilational Rheologymentioning
confidence: 99%