2021
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202040259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface effects and turbulent pressure

Abstract: The application of the full potential of stellar seismology is made difficult by the improper modelling of the upper-most layers of solar-like stars and their influence on the modelled frequencies. Our knowledge of these so-called ‘surface effects’ has improved thanks to the use of 3D hydrodynamical simulations, however, the calculation of eigenfrequencies relies on empirical models for the description of the Lagrangian perturbation of turbulent pressure, namely: the reduced-Γ1 model (RGM) and the gas-Γ1 model… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While these values of the dispersion are smaller than the reference values, they are by no means negligible in the case of the radius and age. Thus, this result calls for an improvement of the modelling of the surface layers of stars, both in what concerns the structure and the pulsations (Mosumgaard et al 2020;Belkacem et al 2021;Jørgensen et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these values of the dispersion are smaller than the reference values, they are by no means negligible in the case of the radius and age. Thus, this result calls for an improvement of the modelling of the surface layers of stars, both in what concerns the structure and the pulsations (Mosumgaard et al 2020;Belkacem et al 2021;Jørgensen et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some aspects, however, are very complicated to model, and existing models make use of assumptions that can barely be justified, if at all. For instance, turbulent pressure modulations are usually described in the Gas-Γ 1 (GGM) or reduced-Γ 1 (RGM) approximations (Rosenthal et al 1999), which amounts to neglecting the effects of turbulent dissipation and buoyancy on the mode (Belkacem et al 2021). Another problem is the use of time-dependent mixing-length formalisms (Unno 1967;Gough 1977) to account for modal surface effects (e.g Gabriel et al 1975;Houdek 1996;Grigahcène et al 2005;Sonoi et al 2017;Houdek et al 2017Houdek et al , 2019.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…uncertainties surrounding the near-surface region are to be faced, namely surface effects (Christensen-Dalsgaard et al 1988). As a result of theoretical developments (Canuto 1997;Belkacem et al 2021) and 3D hydrodynamical simulations (Belkacem et al 2019;Schou & Birch 2020), our understanding of the mechanisms involved in these effects (as well as their contributions) has definitely improved. However, the more costly procedures (Mosumgaard et al 2020) are generally avoided in favour of ad hoc corrections of the oscillation frequencies (Kjeldsen et al 2008;Ball & Gizon 2014;Sonoi et al 2015), which may affect stellar parameter estimates (Nsamba et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%