2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.01.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface energies of metals in both liquid and solid states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
4
45
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…surface free energy at the growth interface and γ dv [20] due to its small surface energy (0.38 J·m -2 ) [33]. Such modifications in interfacial surface energy between the droplet and the substrate arising from the introduction of Sb flux (J Sb ), along with changes in composition [42], may lead to significant nucleus and contact angle [32] changes which could culminate in droplet expansion as depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Nano Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…surface free energy at the growth interface and γ dv [20] due to its small surface energy (0.38 J·m -2 ) [33]. Such modifications in interfacial surface energy between the droplet and the substrate arising from the introduction of Sb flux (J Sb ), along with changes in composition [42], may lead to significant nucleus and contact angle [32] changes which could culminate in droplet expansion as depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Nano Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Sb segregation is enhanced by the low volatility of the relatively heavy Sb atom (atomic number of 51) [31,32]. In order to gain further insight into the segregation of Sb, we undertake a critical analysis of the three key drivers of equilibrium surface segregation proposed by Treglia et al [33]. Sb segregation is promoted [34,35] by: (I) The difference in surface energy between Sb and the solvent (InAs); (II) the difference in atomic size [36]; and (III) the tendency towards phase separation.…”
Section: Nano Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are contradictory experimental results that indicated superior wetting of Ag on a low‐surface‐energy Ge (γ m = 0.748 J m −2 ) surfactant compared to higher‐surface‐energy Cr (γ m = 2.006 J m −2 ), Ti (γ m = 1.749 J m −2 ), and Ni (γ m = 2.08 J m −2 ) surfactants . Any generalization of this scenario indicating that a higher surface free energy of a surfactant is better for improving the wetting of objective metals, should be withheld until more evidence is collected for other surfactant materials with diverse surface free energy values that are already available in the literature . Additionally, the contribution from the applied metallic surfactants to the change in the interfacial free energy should be more clearly understood in order to improve the reliability of any prediction of the role of the surfactants, although direct measurement of the energy has been proven to be quite difficult.…”
Section: Technical Issues In Ultrathin Metal Film Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the bond breaking rule proposed in the previous literature [24], the surface tension γ liquid(ADN melt) can be correlated to surface energy by the following equation:…”
Section: Selection Of Sonication Medium and Polymermentioning
confidence: 99%