2010
DOI: 10.1134/s1063783410070309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface energy and crystal structure of nanowhiskers of III–V semiconductor compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
87
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, implementing reported values for surface energies in the literature [33], which is a measure of g , j A do not show any significant differences between the stability of {¯} 0110 facets of the stem and the {¯} 1120 facets of the kink. Alternatively, differences in absorption efficiency or in thermal dissipation could be a consequence of the differences in geometry of the two types of NWs and thereby explain the observed selectivity.…”
Section: B Amentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, implementing reported values for surface energies in the literature [33], which is a measure of g , j A do not show any significant differences between the stability of {¯} 0110 facets of the stem and the {¯} 1120 facets of the kink. Alternatively, differences in absorption efficiency or in thermal dissipation could be a consequence of the differences in geometry of the two types of NWs and thereby explain the observed selectivity.…”
Section: B Amentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For the WZ sidewall surface energy γ WV we use values taken from Ref. 27: γ WV (WZ1100) = 1.30 J/m 2 and γ WV (WZ1120) = 1.54 J/m 2 . The solid-liquid surface energy, γ SL = 0.59 J/m 2 , is identical for the ZB and WZ nuclei due to the close atomic environments on the surface around the two types of nuclei.…”
Section: Comparison With the Nucleation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the droplet is stable against random horizontal shift smaller than the top facet only when the contact angle exceeds the equilibrium Young's angle β * given by cos β * = (γ SV − γ SL )/γ LV , with γ SV as the solid−vapor surface energy of the top facet (ref 39). The Young's angle equals approximately 70°at γ SV = 0.64 J/m 2 (the surface energy of (111) top plane should be about 20% lower than that of (110) plane according to ref 48). For high enough arsenic flux, the contact angle may decrease faster than the inward tapered facets are introduced and then shrink smaller than the top facet to resume the equilibrium droplet shape, as illustrated by scenario "(iii) Shrinkage" in Figure 4b.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%