2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for the detection of microplastics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from Figure e that the strongest characteristic peak at 999 cm –1 originates from the C–C ring breathing mode of PS, and the 619, 1031, 1447, and 1600 cm –1 are due to the ring deformation mode, the CH– in-plane deformation band, ν 19b or δ­(CH 2 ), and the C–C stretching vibrations, respectively. , Figure g shows the SERS spectrum of PE, in which the intensive peaks are 1061 cm –1 (the anti-symmetric C–C stretching mode), 1127 cm –1 (symmetric C–C stretching mode), and 1295 cm –1 (CH 2 twisting mode). Three distinct peaks around 1440 cm –1 are assigned to the CH 2 bending modes, while the peaks at 2850 and 2882 cm –1 are assigned to the symmetric and asymmetric CH 2 stretching modes, respectively Figure f,h shows the PIERS and SERS spectra of the PS and PE captured on the substrate, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen from Figure e that the strongest characteristic peak at 999 cm –1 originates from the C–C ring breathing mode of PS, and the 619, 1031, 1447, and 1600 cm –1 are due to the ring deformation mode, the CH– in-plane deformation band, ν 19b or δ­(CH 2 ), and the C–C stretching vibrations, respectively. , Figure g shows the SERS spectrum of PE, in which the intensive peaks are 1061 cm –1 (the anti-symmetric C–C stretching mode), 1127 cm –1 (symmetric C–C stretching mode), and 1295 cm –1 (CH 2 twisting mode). Three distinct peaks around 1440 cm –1 are assigned to the CH 2 bending modes, while the peaks at 2850 and 2882 cm –1 are assigned to the symmetric and asymmetric CH 2 stretching modes, respectively Figure f,h shows the PIERS and SERS spectra of the PS and PE captured on the substrate, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three distinct peaks around 1440 cm −1 are assigned to the CH 2 bending modes, while the peaks at 2850 and 2882 cm −1 are assigned to the symmetric and asymmetric CH 2 stretching modes, respectively. 38 Figure 5f,h shows the PIERS and SERS spectra of the PS and PE captured on the substrate, respectively. It can be seen that the PIERS technology has achieved an order of magnitude enhancement for PS and PE detection compared with SERS, and a detection limit of 25 μg/mL has been realized, confirming the successful analysis of microplastics by PIERS.…”
Section: Piers Em Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1a shows the UV-VIS absorbance peak of the AuNP colloidal solution, exhibiting a plasmon resonance peak at approximately 520 nm, and thus efficient excitation within the range of 488 nm to 532 nm would result in maximum enhancement during SERS 14 . However, because subsequent formation of gold nanoparticle aggregates leads to a (red) shift of the plasmon resonance peak toward longer wavelengths, an excitation source of 785 nm was used for SERS measurements of the aggregates.…”
Section: Sers Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those measurements, seen in Figure 1b, show that both peaks were clearly visible for each concentration of PS solutions, ranging from 0.001 -0.1 mg/ml. It is known that the factors that most significantly impact enhancement are the spatial separation of the analyte (in this case PS beads) from the substrate (here AuNP aggregates), and its uniform distribution and aggregation 14 . Furthermore, research indicates that the improvement of SERS enhancement is largely dependent on various factors such as the size and concentration of AuNPs [11].…”
Section: Sers Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dramatic increase in plastic production and widespread use in recent decades have led to a global accumulation of plastic debris, causing increasing environmental problems . Under the action of photo-oxidation, high temperature, biodegradation, and mechanical abrasion, plastic debris is broken down into microplastics (1 μm–5 mm) and nanoplastics (<1 μm). , Extensive exposure to micro-/nanoplastics in freshwater, seawater, soil, food, and the atmosphere poses serious harm to ecology, aquatic organisms, and human beings. The harmful effects of plastic pollution are of increasing concern due to their persistent toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%