1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6028(98)00666-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface etching of InP(100) by chlorine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed some differences between the two spectra, particularly there is a contribution (A) at 16,7 eV binding energy clearly visible at 50 eV. This contribution can be attributed to metallic indium [9] due to the indium droplets created by the ionic cleaning. The fact that the metallic indium droplets are clearly seen at 50 eV (32 eV kinetic energy) but not at 190 eV (172 eV kinetic energy, less surface sensitive) proves that the formation of indium clusters is a surface phenomenon.…”
Section: Cleaning Of the Substratesmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observed some differences between the two spectra, particularly there is a contribution (A) at 16,7 eV binding energy clearly visible at 50 eV. This contribution can be attributed to metallic indium [9] due to the indium droplets created by the ionic cleaning. The fact that the metallic indium droplets are clearly seen at 50 eV (32 eV kinetic energy) but not at 190 eV (172 eV kinetic energy, less surface sensitive) proves that the formation of indium clusters is a surface phenomenon.…”
Section: Cleaning Of the Substratesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…To decompose the In 4d and the P 2p core levels, we have to know the different chemical environments of the indium and phosphorus atoms. Previous works [7,8] showed that after ionic cleaning, the surface is covered by 25% of metallic indium droplets with an equivalent height of Regarding previous studies on InP(100) [10,11,12,13,14], it is very difficult to find a definitive result on the decomposition of In4d peak, most of the authors found a bulk In-P contribution, and two or three surface peaks assigned to indium adatoms.…”
Section: Cleaning Of the Substratesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…32,48 This indium hydroxide component explains the presence of the OHgroups component in the initial O 1s core level spectrum measured on the p-GaInP 2 (100) surface emersed from the electrolyte solution under ZCP conditions (Figure 4a). The component with ΔBE = 0.4 eV is assigned to InCl 29,50 as the Cl 2p photoemission is always visible after exposure of the p-GaInP 2 (100) surface to the 1 M HCl aq solution (Figure S2), though the In 2 O 3 -related component has similar chemical shift. 32,48 Obviously, the application of the cathodic bias in the dark to the p-GaInP 2 (100)/1 M HCl aq solution interface has very little effect on the shape of the In 3d spectrum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The components, which are at ΔBE of 0.7 and 1.3 eV, are assigned to indium hydroxide In­(OH) 3 and indium phosphate InPO 4 , respectively. , This indium hydroxide component explains the presence of the OH-groups component in the initial O 1s core level spectrum measured on the p-GaInP 2 (100) surface emersed from the electrolyte solution under ZCP conditions (Figure a). The component with ΔBE = 0.4 eV is assigned to InCl , as the Cl 2p photoemission is always visible after exposure of the p-GaInP 2 (100) surface to the 1 M HCl aq solution (Figure S2), though the In 2 O 3 -related component has similar chemical shift. , Obviously, the application of the cathodic bias in the dark to the p-GaInP 2 (100)/1 M HCl aq solution interface has very little effect on the shape of the In 3d spectrum. As can be seen from the difference spectra, only a decrease of the metallic indium signal is observed after exposure to the solution under −0.7 V, whereas after exposure under −1.8 V in dark the In 3d spectrum remains essentially unchanged (Figure b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are in agreement with what is known about the behaviour of chlorinated GaAs and InP surfaces under thermal and plasma excitation. They can be explained considering that GaAs and InP differ in the formation of surface chlorides [4][5], in the volatility of the chlorides [6] and in their ion-bombardment-stimulated desorption [7][8][9]. Of GaCl x , AsCl x , InCl x , and PCl x (x = 1, 2, 3) chloride species that form on GaAs and InP, respectively, the removal of GaCl 3 , AsCl 3 , InCl 3 , and PCl 3 is believed to be the most important for their dry etching.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%