2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2007.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface evolution models in abrasive jet micromachining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
284
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(290 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
284
1
Order By: Relevance
“…as a function of process and material variables [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. For hard and brittle materials, the impact force of the abrasive particle causes localized cracks at the work surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…as a function of process and material variables [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. For hard and brittle materials, the impact force of the abrasive particle causes localized cracks at the work surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ciampini et al [5] studied the interference effects between an incident stream of spheres and those rebounding from a flat surface, and developed a computer model to examine the severity and frequency of interparticle collisions. Ghobeity et al [6] extended an existing erosion model to predict the cross-sectional profiles of unmasked micromachined channels in borosilicate, in which the experimentally obtained spatial and velocity distributions of particles in the jet of an AJM were used. In [6], particle velocity across a circular jet was measured using a phase-Doppler particle analyzer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in Figure 5.3, wear scars generated from tests with cylindrical nozzles are axi-symmetrical and present a Gaussian type of profile. Ghobeity et al [177] found this type of profile to be the result of a radial linear decrease of velocity from a maximum value found at the center of the nozzle combined to a Weibull radial mass flux probability distribution function of the particles exiting the nozzle. Completing a full scan is very time consuming.…”
Section: Spe Testing Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past 15 years, much work on the influence of process parameters on the shape of erosion scars has been done in the context of abrasion jet micromachining of glass for flat panel displays [69,71,167,[170][171][172][173][174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181]. In particular, the work of Papini, Spelt and coworkers [167,170,[174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181] has led to many interesting findings on the importance of working parameters such as feed rate and WD on the erosion process. As we will discuss in the next sections, the Gaussian profile of the wear scar has enabled us to measure the volume loss of eroded samples using a simple profilometry methodology and other results regarding particle interference effects have helped us to optimize our erosion testing methodology.…”
Section: Erosion Wear Scar Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where t c is determined using Equation (39). In a similar manner, the limiting time-step size for a grain-surface collision can also be calculated.…”
Section: (T + T) = Y(t)+ T F (T + T)mentioning
confidence: 99%