2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.09.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface evolution of a corroding metal as a moving boundary problem by random assignment of anodic and cathodic sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The assignment of the boundary conditions is random and periodic in time, which enables a macroscopic uniform corrosion progress of the surface. The model is independent from the introduced parameters for the microelectrodes, that is, their width Δx or total number N and the period for changing their boundary conditions Δt. The new approach is tested by reproducing the rates of uniform corrosion for zinc and steel from the NSS test. In contrast to the work of Shaik and Thamida, the model predicts the corrosion depth for both zinc and steel in the correct order of magnitude. In addition, it reproduces the ratio of corrosion rates for zinc to steel. Galvanic corrosion of a zinc‐steel couple is modeled without computing the concentration of reactants or corrosion products but with consideration of varying cathode activity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The assignment of the boundary conditions is random and periodic in time, which enables a macroscopic uniform corrosion progress of the surface. The model is independent from the introduced parameters for the microelectrodes, that is, their width Δx or total number N and the period for changing their boundary conditions Δt. The new approach is tested by reproducing the rates of uniform corrosion for zinc and steel from the NSS test. In contrast to the work of Shaik and Thamida, the model predicts the corrosion depth for both zinc and steel in the correct order of magnitude. In addition, it reproduces the ratio of corrosion rates for zinc to steel. Galvanic corrosion of a zinc‐steel couple is modeled without computing the concentration of reactants or corrosion products but with consideration of varying cathode activity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…However, Shaik and Thamida utilize two polarization curves of steel obtained both under the virtually same conditions. Their measurements of 304 stainless steel in pH‐neutral electrolyte yield a potential difference by less than 10 mV and the predicted anodic current is inormala<5E5 mA/cm 2 . Thus, the predicted corrosion rate according to Faraday's law is <1.6E3μm/d, which is three orders of magnitude smaller compared to the norm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The current FEM based model originates from for galvanic corrosion model presented by Deshpande and Höche with modifications from Shaik and Thamida and Gießgen et al to account for uniform corrosion. Following assumptions and simplifications are made: …”
Section: Computational Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%