2020
DOI: 10.1111/all.14252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface expression of MRGPRX2 on resting basophils: An area of controversy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was surprising that Sabato et al 1 found similar MRGPRX2 expression of unstimulated basophils of birch pollen allergics and of anti-IgE stimulated controls (median 4, range 0-14, Table 1). Having analyzed a huge variety of stimuli (unpublished), among the few substances, we identified as inducers of basophil MRGPRX2 surface expression there were two, namely anti-IgE and fMLP, that were also described by Sabato et al 1 Re-analyzing our BAT data of grass-pollen allergic subjects regarding CD63 and MRGPRX2 expression, we found that there was a significant correlation in anti-FcεRI stimulated basophils, but not in basophils stimulated with medium or fMLP (Figure 3). This confirms on the one hand that our basophils were not activated by the isolation method or the medium control and that activation of the cells, that is, by stimulation with fMLP, did not always result in MRGPRX2 upregulation.…”
Section: Mrgprx2 Pementioning
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It was surprising that Sabato et al 1 found similar MRGPRX2 expression of unstimulated basophils of birch pollen allergics and of anti-IgE stimulated controls (median 4, range 0-14, Table 1). Having analyzed a huge variety of stimuli (unpublished), among the few substances, we identified as inducers of basophil MRGPRX2 surface expression there were two, namely anti-IgE and fMLP, that were also described by Sabato et al 1 Re-analyzing our BAT data of grass-pollen allergic subjects regarding CD63 and MRGPRX2 expression, we found that there was a significant correlation in anti-FcεRI stimulated basophils, but not in basophils stimulated with medium or fMLP (Figure 3). This confirms on the one hand that our basophils were not activated by the isolation method or the medium control and that activation of the cells, that is, by stimulation with fMLP, did not always result in MRGPRX2 upregulation.…”
Section: Mrgprx2 Pementioning
confidence: 82%
“…Secondly, in their correspondence Sabato et al criticize that we have not mentioned their postulation about the potential of basophil activation experiments in immediate hypersensitivity reactions originating from MRGPRX2 occupancy by quinolones. 1,4 We appreciate this comment on their data demonstrating that hypersensitivity to moxiflocacin is difficult to capture by traditional CD63/CD203c-based basophil activation test. 4 Nevertheless, in their study, they explored whether simultaneous quantification of alterations of CD63/CD203c surface expression and changes of the intracellular histamine content at a single-cell level could help to disentangle the effect of moxiflocacin on basophils.…”
Section: Mrgprx2 Pementioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations