2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2010.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface forces action in a vicinity of three phase contact line and other current problems in kinetics of wetting and spreading

Abstract: Citation: STAROV, V., 2010. Surface forces action in a vicinity of three phase contact line and other current problems in kinetics of wetting and spreading.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(73 reference statements)
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This equation represents the so-called Derjaguin-Frumkin equation (Starov et al 2007), relating the Young angle to the microscopic forces close to the contact line: γ cos θ Y = γ cos θ µ + φ µ (h = 0), where θ µ represents the microscopic angle at the contact line and we have used h x | x0 = tan θ µ and Young equation γ sg − γ sl = γ cos θ Y (Yeh et al 1999;Starov et al 2007;Starov 2010). The above two constraints on continuity of the energy and the augmented Young equation lead to h x (x 0 ) = 0, or θ µ = 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equation represents the so-called Derjaguin-Frumkin equation (Starov et al 2007), relating the Young angle to the microscopic forces close to the contact line: γ cos θ Y = γ cos θ µ + φ µ (h = 0), where θ µ represents the microscopic angle at the contact line and we have used h x | x0 = tan θ µ and Young equation γ sg − γ sl = γ cos θ Y (Yeh et al 1999;Starov et al 2007;Starov 2010). The above two constraints on continuity of the energy and the augmented Young equation lead to h x (x 0 ) = 0, or θ µ = 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recently presented static equilibrium computations of droplets with multiple contact lines, wetting geometrically patterned solid surfaces [29][30][31] . According to our approach, the liquid/ambient (LA) and the liquid/solid interfaces are treated in a unified context (one equation for both interfaces) by: a) employing the Young-Laplace equation 32 augmented with a disjoining (or Derjaguin) pressure term 33,34 , which accounts for the micro-scale liquid/solid interactions, and b) parameterizing the liquid surface in terms of its arc-length of the effectively onedimensional droplet profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the exponents 1 C and 2 C control the range of the molecular interactions (large 1 C and 2 C reduce the range within which these interactions are active. The distance, δ , between the liquid and the solid surface determines whether the disjoining pressure is attractive (modeling van der Waals interactions, for relatively large δ ) or repulsive (modeling steric forces and electrostatic interactions determined by an overlapping of the electrical double layers, for small δ ) [28]. In the case of a perfectly flat solid surface, the distance, δ , is defined as the vertical distance of the liquid surface from the solid boundary.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%