2020
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences10090334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Geomorphological Features of Deep-Seated Gravitational Slope Deformations: A Look to the Role of Lithostructure (N Apennines, Italy)

Abstract: The attention to deep-seated gravitational slope deformations (DSGSDs) has steadily increased in the last few decades, because such features are ubiquitous in mountain areas. Their geomorphological surface expression, especially when related to the effects of lithostructural control in sedimentary stratified bedrocks, is well characterized in theory, but sometimes not as well documented in field cases. In this contribution the investigation of several DSGSDs in the area of the Northern Apennines of Italy is re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…satellite data and space-borne interferometric synthetic aperture radar) (Frattini et al, 2018;Mantovani et al, 2016;Novellino et al, 2021) and proximal sensing such as unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV; Deiana et al, 2021;Devoto et al, 2020;Eker & Aydın, 2021) and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) have enabled a better understanding of these processes. They are characterised by extremely slow deformation rates (Cruden & Varnes, 1996) and landform assemblages such as doublecrested ridges, trenches, synthetic and antithetic (uphill-facing) scarps, tension cracks, and convex (bulged toes) and deep basal shear zones (Agliardi et al, 2001;Chigira, 1992;Crosta et al, 2013;Mariani & Zerboni, 2020;Panek & Klimeš, 2016). Shear zones exhibit the characteristics of cataclastic breccias with abundant fine matrix (Crosta & Zanchi, 2000) and thicknesses up to tens of metres (Ostermann & Sanders, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…satellite data and space-borne interferometric synthetic aperture radar) (Frattini et al, 2018;Mantovani et al, 2016;Novellino et al, 2021) and proximal sensing such as unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV; Deiana et al, 2021;Devoto et al, 2020;Eker & Aydın, 2021) and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) have enabled a better understanding of these processes. They are characterised by extremely slow deformation rates (Cruden & Varnes, 1996) and landform assemblages such as doublecrested ridges, trenches, synthetic and antithetic (uphill-facing) scarps, tension cracks, and convex (bulged toes) and deep basal shear zones (Agliardi et al, 2001;Chigira, 1992;Crosta et al, 2013;Mariani & Zerboni, 2020;Panek & Klimeš, 2016). Shear zones exhibit the characteristics of cataclastic breccias with abundant fine matrix (Crosta & Zanchi, 2000) and thicknesses up to tens of metres (Ostermann & Sanders, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although DGSDs play an important role in slope evolution and geo-hydrological risk, knowledge about them was scarce for a long time [42]. They are characterized by very slow deformation rates [34], landform assemblages (such as double-crested ridges, trenches, synthetic and antithetic scarps, tension cracks, and convex bulged toes), and deep basal shear zones [43][44][45][46][47]. Often, shear zones present characteristics of cataclastic breccias with an abundant fine matrix [48] and thicknesses up to tens of meters [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peculiar morphologies associated with DGSDs are double-crested ridges, ridge-top grabens, scarps and counterslope scarps, ridge-parallel trenches, tension cracks, and bulging slopes (Agliardi et al, 2001(Agliardi et al, , 2012. Several natural factors, and their interaction, control the formation of these large slope instabilities, such as the lithostratigraphic and structural setting (Agliardi et al, 2001;Hermann et al, 2000;Mariani & Zerboni, 2020), the topographic relief and the state of the stress (Ambrosi & Crosta, 2006Martel, 2006;Molnar, 2004), weather and climate (Agliardi et al, 2001;Evans & Clague, 1994), and seismic faulting (Jibson et al, 2004;McCalpin, 1999). Significant natural hazards are associated with DGSDs (Ambrosi & Crosta, 2006;Dramis & Sorriso-Valvo, 1994), in particular due to a sudden acceleration of the slope movements commonly induced by seismic faulting (Chigira et al, 2010;Moro et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%