Nanoporous hard templates containing arrays of aligned cylindrical channels, such as nanoporous alumina (anodic aluminum oxide, AAO), have been used for the fabrication of nanotubes and nanorods by various techniques, including polymerization of monomers inside the channels 1,2 as well as layer-by-layer deposition of polypeptides and proteins. 3 Nanoporous membranes functionalized with apoenzymes, 4 antibodies, 5,6 and DNA 7 were used for enantioselective separations, 4,5 detection of antigens, 6 and selective DNA permeation with single-base mismatch selectivity. 7 However, macromolecules located inside AAO hard templates may have different segmental dynamics from that in bulk systems that could affect the performance of membrane configurations based on the functionality of biomolecules. Even though dynamics of polymers near interfaces and in thin films has received a great deal of attention, 8 only a few synthetic materials confined to cylindrical nanopores, such as poly(alkylsiloxanes), 9-11 poly-(poly(methyl acrylate) (PMA), 12 polystyrene, 13 and liquid crystals, [14][15][16] have been investigated by different methods, but with different results: enhanced local mobility, 16 unchanged glass temperature but an enhanced chain mobility, 13 whereas in PMA the glass temperature was increased relative to the bulk. 12 Moreover, previous studies of the dynamics of macromolecules in AAO were predominantly carried out using commercially available filter membranes characterized by disordered arrays of nanopores having diameters D scattered around 200 nm. However, mesophase textures 17 and crystallization of polymers 18-20 in self-ordered AAO hard templates 21 characterized by narrow pore diameter distributions showed a clear dependence on D. Remarkably, little is known as to how pore diameter and rigid pore walls influence the dynamics of biomolecules confined to AAO, even though it is well-known that, for example, the self-organization of polypeptides in the proximity of interfaces is different from that in the bulk. 22,23 Polypeptides are polymers of exceptional interest because of their close relationship to proteins, their flexibility in functionality, and their molecular recognition properties. They form hierarchically ordered structures containing R-helices, which can be regarded as rigid rods stabilized by intramolecular hydrogen bonds, and -sheets (stabilized by intermolecular hydrogen bonds) as fundamental secondary motifs. 24,25 Recent dynamic studies of bulk polypeptides as a function of molecular weight and external pressure revealed that the segmental dynamics is associated with the relaxation of amorphous-like segments within the chain and at the chain ends related to broken hydrogen bonds (largely of intramolecular origin). 26,27 A different interpretation emphasizing the side-group mobility has also been provided for the same dynamic process by another group. 28 The existence of (a defected) R-helical secondary structure gives rise to a larger dipole moment parallel to the helical axis that relaxes on a ...