2020
DOI: 10.21608/ajnsa.2020.21757.1317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface -Groundwater Interaction in the Area between El-Timsah Lake and Ismailia Canal Using Hydrochemical and Isotopic Techniques

Abstract: An attempt was made to understand how surface-groundwater interaction and impact both water quality and quantity in the area between El-Timsah Lake and Ismailia Canal, Egypt. Twenty one surface and groundwater samples were collected from the study area. Hydrochemical data revealed that total dissolved solid (TDS) of Ismailia Canal and groundwater samples ranged from 328 to 613 and 345.7-1099 mg/l respectively. Salinity of El-Timsah Lake samples ranged from 16730 to 34560 mg/l. The lowest salinity was existed i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Groundwater values, however, might be more reflective of pre-damming values in the region. There are some environmental isotope studies providing values from groundwater and well sources in the northeastern Nile Delta between the Damietta Branch and Ismailia Canal (Ahmed et al 2013;Al-Gamal et al 2018;Eissa et al 2019;Gomaah et al 2016;Hamza et al 1987;Hassan et al 2020). Groundwater and well samples from these studies (n = 181) display an average value of 2.23 ± 1.43‰ (1 SD).…”
Section: δ 18 Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groundwater values, however, might be more reflective of pre-damming values in the region. There are some environmental isotope studies providing values from groundwater and well sources in the northeastern Nile Delta between the Damietta Branch and Ismailia Canal (Ahmed et al 2013;Al-Gamal et al 2018;Eissa et al 2019;Gomaah et al 2016;Hamza et al 1987;Hassan et al 2020). Groundwater and well samples from these studies (n = 181) display an average value of 2.23 ± 1.43‰ (1 SD).…”
Section: δ 18 Omentioning
confidence: 99%