Polymer Morphology 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781118892756.ch12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface‐induced Polymer Crystallization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 224 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be concluded that both the surface structure and the partial chemical fluorination affect the interfacial morphology. On the one hand, surfaces with potholes and polar groups enhance the adhesion properties of the film, while, on the other hand, acting as heterogeneous-nucleating agents, which influence the crystallization kinetics by enhancing the interaction between the joint surfaces and improving the crystallization rate with the formation of shish-kebab crystals [34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be concluded that both the surface structure and the partial chemical fluorination affect the interfacial morphology. On the one hand, surfaces with potholes and polar groups enhance the adhesion properties of the film, while, on the other hand, acting as heterogeneous-nucleating agents, which influence the crystallization kinetics by enhancing the interaction between the joint surfaces and improving the crystallization rate with the formation of shish-kebab crystals [34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both arrangements provide the same diffraction patterns as those in Figures and . The epitaxial growth of a polymer from a substrate generally requires matching in crystallographic geometry, such as the coincidence of unit cell dimensions or molecular distances in the contact planes . For the PLLA α form, the length of the c -axis ( A in Figure ), which corresponds to the length of 10 repeating units in the 10/3 helical chain, is 28.86 Å, whereas the distance between PLLA chains in the (110) PLLA plane ( B in Figure ) is 6.17 Å .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The epitaxial growth of a polymer from a substrate generally requires matching in crystallographic geometry, such as the coincidence of unit cell dimensions or molecular distances in the contact planes. 30 For the PLLA α form, the length of the c-axis (A in Figure 9), which corresponds to the length of 10 repeating units in the 10/3 helical chain, is 28.86 Å, whereas the distance between PLLA chains in the (110) PLLA plane (B in Figure 9) is 6.17 Å. 22 The matching in crystallographic spacing at the contact plane can be evaluated using the following equation: 31,32 where Δ denotes the discrepancy in the form of one percentage, and d o and d s denote the lattice periodicities of the overgrowth and substrate crystals, respectively.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FTIR spectra showed distinctive absorption bands assigned to their different functional groups, indicating the peaks at 2997 cm −1 and 2946 cm −1 to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibration of C-H 3 group, respectively, in the PLLA polymer chain. The major spectral band at 1749 cm −1 (assigned to tt conformers) represents the carbonyl stretching vibration and the band at 1458 cm −1 aroused from the asymmetric deformation vibration of C-H 3 [37]. Furthermore, the absorption bands at 1187 and 1089 cm −1 are due to the symmetric stretching vibration of C-O-C and the band at 871 cm −1 representing the vibration of the C-COO [38].…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%