1995
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(95)00085-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface magnetic moments and electronic structure of Cr(100), Fe(100), and Ni(100) near the Fermi level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the magnetic moment of the interface increases as compared with that of BCC Fe bulk. These values agree well with the surface local DOSs obtained for seven-layer Fe(1 0 0) films by FLAPW calculations of Ostroukhov et al[7]. Also those values agree well with the result of DFT calculations which obtained for Fe 9 [9 atomic layers]/Mg 1 O 1 [1 atomic layer] by Yu et al[8] and the experimental value by Miyokawa et al…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Thus, the magnetic moment of the interface increases as compared with that of BCC Fe bulk. These values agree well with the surface local DOSs obtained for seven-layer Fe(1 0 0) films by FLAPW calculations of Ostroukhov et al[7]. Also those values agree well with the result of DFT calculations which obtained for Fe 9 [9 atomic layers]/Mg 1 O 1 [1 atomic layer] by Yu et al[8] and the experimental value by Miyokawa et al…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…For 3 Cr layers the Cr moment (at the middle layer) increases slightly, which indicates a tendency to obtain enhanced moments with the increase of the thickness of the Cr layers. According to spin-polarized FLAPW calculations for Cr(100)/Fe layers the Cr moment decreases as going from the surface to inner layers [23]. However, as pointed out by the authors this is not an effect of a finite slab thickness, and the deviation relative to experimental results is a consequence of using the experimental bulk lattice constant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…On the Cr͑001͒ surface, in comparison to V, the debate about magnetism seems to be more settled. Experimental [26][27][28] and theoretical [28][29][30][31] investigations indicate that the surface is magnetic and that the magnetic moment is enhanced as compared to the bulk value. But even then LSDA calculations of the Cr͑001͒ surface seem to predict a somewhat too strongly enhanced magnetic moment of 2.5 B .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%