1994
DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(94)91517-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface magnetic relaxation in cement pastes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The monotonic increase in T 1 with cooling is expected given the thermally activated process driving the surface relaxation, T 1 α exp(−E a /kT ) with E a = 0.11 eV (Blinc et al 1988, Mendelson et al 1994. Computation of this effect results in a factor of 2.6 increase in T 1 when freezing from T -T 0 = 10 to −40 K, in agreement with the T1 measured values.…”
Section: T 1 Mappingsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The monotonic increase in T 1 with cooling is expected given the thermally activated process driving the surface relaxation, T 1 α exp(−E a /kT ) with E a = 0.11 eV (Blinc et al 1988, Mendelson et al 1994. Computation of this effect results in a factor of 2.6 increase in T 1 when freezing from T -T 0 = 10 to −40 K, in agreement with the T1 measured values.…”
Section: T 1 Mappingsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Computation of this effect results in a factor of 2.6 increase in T 1 when freezing from T -T 0 = 10 to −40 K, in agreement with the T1 measured values. When additional desorption due to the vapour pressure conditions in the pore system is triggered at around T -T 0 = −40 K, a more pronounced T 1 increase during freezing is observed (Mendelson et al 1994). This secondary phase transition also results in a slight decrease in the α parameter between T -T 0 = −40 and −45 K. It should be noted that short spin-lattice relaxation times allow for faster pulse sequence repetition.…”
Section: T 1 Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore we can rewrite the requirement for the perfectly reflecting wall approximation, Ma/D Ӷ 1, as M⌬/a Ӷ 1. Hence, in systems with smaller pores or slower diffusing fluids, or in materials, such as rocks (24) and cement pastes (25), where the mineralogy can significantly increase the surface relaxation, the effect cannot necessarily be ignored. Hence, it is useful to have an understanding of the effect and significance of the fluid-surface interaction on the q-space data.…”
Section: Effect Of Wall Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For protons of liquid confined in the pore space of materials, a relaxation rate is increased one in comparison with rate in bulk solution (Peemoeller et al 1981;D'Orazio et al 1990;Henkelman et al 1994;Takamiya et al 2000;Callaghan 2011;Rodin et al 2004bRodin et al , 2013Rodin 2017Rodin , 2018c. In order to consider the interactions at the liquid-solid interface and to use theoretical models for some applications, it is necessary to assume the short-range surface interactions and a fast exchange of molecules between the bulk fraction and the liquid on the surface (Mendelson et al 1994;Gran and Hansent 1998;Song et al 2008;Takemura et al 2012;Palmer 2014;Rodin 2018c). In such a case, there will be averaging between different environments.…”
Section: Nmr (T 1 and T 2 ) Relaxation Times And Model Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%