2016
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/13/135002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface magnetization and the role of pattern defects in various types of ripple patterned films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This large discrepancy can be understood in terms of several factors: i) with increasing film thickness the surface topography of the film is expected to get smeared out resulting in decrease in the modulation depth h, ii) the actual surface/interface contour of the film deviates from an ideal sinusoidal shape in terms of various defects like height corrugation and breaks of continuity along the ripple direction and overlapping ripples and defects like pattern dislocation. 8 In conclusion, evolution of magnetic anisotropy of cobalt film deposited at normal incident on nanopatterned silicon substrate has been studied with increasing film thickness. In-situ MOKE measurements during film deposition allowed us to follow the magnetization behaviour with film thickness, keeping all the other parameters like surface topology and deposition conditions identical.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This large discrepancy can be understood in terms of several factors: i) with increasing film thickness the surface topography of the film is expected to get smeared out resulting in decrease in the modulation depth h, ii) the actual surface/interface contour of the film deviates from an ideal sinusoidal shape in terms of various defects like height corrugation and breaks of continuity along the ripple direction and overlapping ripples and defects like pattern dislocation. 8 In conclusion, evolution of magnetic anisotropy of cobalt film deposited at normal incident on nanopatterned silicon substrate has been studied with increasing film thickness. In-situ MOKE measurements during film deposition allowed us to follow the magnetization behaviour with film thickness, keeping all the other parameters like surface topology and deposition conditions identical.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This study also demonstrates that nucleation processes governing magnetization reversal is at the heart of coercivity enhancement, which is the path for the development of high performance permanent magnets 38 , as well as it explains why the SW model can describe successfully the angular-dependence properties of more complex extended systems, i.e., exchange biased ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic bilayers 39 42 and ripple patterned films 43 , where nucleative processes are much more relevant even in quasi-static conditions. This study emphasizes the importance of dynamical effects in order to understand and control magnetic systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…As commented above, in the vicinity of the HA, the Voigt effect is basically ∝ M 2 ⊥ and we could outline an expected behaviour of M ⊥ under the applied H around HA. In spite of the quadratic dependence of δ V on H, that simulation could help us to visualize the M ⊥ reversal perpendicular to the anisotropy axis (Φ = 0), similarly to vectorial Kerr measurements in nanostructured Co films [15,29]. These modelized cycles can be seen in the insets of Fig.…”
Section: Magnetic Birefringencementioning
confidence: 81%
“…After deposition, the magnetic thin film grown on that ripples array reproduces the same spatial pattern, showing a coincident anisotropy axis parallel to the ripples direction. Thus, in this corrugated Permalloy film, two different sources rule the M reversal in such anisotropic system, on one hand, the nucleation and growth of 180 • magnetic domains along the ripple direction (easy magnetic axis, EA), on the other hand, the coherent rotation of M perpendicular to the ripple direction (hard magnetic, HA) [15,29]. The existence of these unlike mechanisms to switch M consequently affects the linear polarized light transmitting across the sample, yielding the occurrence of two intensity peaks centered above the coercive field, H C , values [28,30].…”
Section: Magnetic Birefringencementioning
confidence: 99%