2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface modification of commercial reverse osmosis membranes using both hydrophilic polymer and graphene oxide to improve desalination efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major, high weight loss (13%) was observed at 252°C, followed by 20% at 625°C, was fully in conformity with published data, and showed the same % DTG 27. Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectroscopy was a tool to recognize functional groups of GO nanostructure used in the prepared complex structure, as illustrated in Figure 3, and showed conformity with distinguished peaks at 3400, 1800, and 1040 cm −1 19 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The major, high weight loss (13%) was observed at 252°C, followed by 20% at 625°C, was fully in conformity with published data, and showed the same % DTG 27. Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectroscopy was a tool to recognize functional groups of GO nanostructure used in the prepared complex structure, as illustrated in Figure 3, and showed conformity with distinguished peaks at 3400, 1800, and 1040 cm −1 19 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectroscopy was a tool to recognize functional groups of GO nanostructure used in the prepared complex structure, as illustrated in Figure 3, and showed F I G U R E 1 XRD-plot for obtained GO nanoparticles conformity with distinguished peaks at 3400, 1800, and 1040 cm À1 . 19…”
Section: Characterization Of Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The filtration performance of all membranes was assessed by the filtration of the BSA protein and dye solutions (250 and 100 mg/L, respectively). The removal efficiency ( R ) was calculated by Equation () 44 R%=1CPCf×100. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrophilicity of the separation membrane has a direct impact on its final water flux, which is also the main reason why scholars have been committed to improving the hydrophilicity of the membrane. [41][42][43] In addition, for the porous hollow fiber membrane used as the substrate for the composite membrane, a hydrophilic membrane surface would be more conducive to the adsorption and distribution of aqueous monomers on it. 44 Membrane surface hydrophilicity was determined by measurements of the WCA, and variations of the WCAs of different PSF hollow fiber membranes with contact time are shown in Figure 8(a).…”
Section: Surface Hydrophilicity Of Different Psf Hollow Fiber Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%