2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(02)00547-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface modification of ultrafiltration membranes by preadsorption of a negatively charged polymer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
53
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, G2 and G3 resulted in greater permeate fl ux resistance, consistent with higher pore blockage of the support. [ 19 ] Though the pore size of the PES support is not known, the molecular weight cut-off reported by the manufacturer is in the range of 0.9 to 2.3 kDa. plateaus at ca.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterization Of Aramide Dendrimersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, G2 and G3 resulted in greater permeate fl ux resistance, consistent with higher pore blockage of the support. [ 19 ] Though the pore size of the PES support is not known, the molecular weight cut-off reported by the manufacturer is in the range of 0.9 to 2.3 kDa. plateaus at ca.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterization Of Aramide Dendrimersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 10 ] Such high water permeability ( A D = 5.2 m/(MPa · d)) was comparable to that of the G3 membrane and slightly larger than that of the G2 membrane (Supporting We believe that G2 could impact more the membrane fl ow rate compared to G3 since the molecular weight of G2 is in the range of the PES cut-off, closer to the upper limit, and it could therefore cause more pore blockage. [ 19 ] The permeate samples collected from the percolation experiments were analyzed by UV-vis spectroscopy to provide direct information about the amount of dendrimers in the permeate solutions as a function of the percolation time (Figure 4 b-d).…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterization Of Aramide Dendrimersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of ultrafiltration is seriously limited by membrane fouling. In the last years, many researchers have revealed that increasing the hydrophilicity of the membrane surfaces and pore surfaces can remarkably reduce or suppress membrane fouling [77][78][79][80][81][82][83]. Accordingly, hydrophilic molecules, such as poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and zwitterionic molecules, have been widely used to modify the ultrafiltration membranes [84][85][86].…”
Section: Protein-adsorption-resistant Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Compared with hydrophobic membranes, the membranes with hydrophilic surface have great advantage in reducing protein adsorption and deposition. 15,16 To resolve the fouling problem, a number of approaches, such as coating, 17 blend, 18,19 surface graft polymerization, 20,21 and chemical modification [22][23][24][25] have been reported in the literatures to reduce the membrane fouling. A particularly effective hydrophilic polymer for surface modification is poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) due to its excellent resistance to protein adsorption and inherent biocompatibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%