2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface modified Nafion® membrane by ion beam bombardment for fuel cell applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
24
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that the poor performance of the remaining membranes occurs due to a combination of a reduced proton conductivity and poor adhesion between electrode and membrane and that this is due to the plasma treatment and not the preparation of the membrane or the result of storage under vacuum. These results are again different to Cho et al [6] who found an increase from 300 to 620 mW cm −2 when using ion bombarded Nafion in their MEAs. Our results could however explain the 'drastic' increase in performance Cha and Lee [13] observed when they first coated their Nafion membrane with a Nafion/carbon ink (NCI) prior to catalyst sputtering.…”
Section: Mea Performancecontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is clear that the poor performance of the remaining membranes occurs due to a combination of a reduced proton conductivity and poor adhesion between electrode and membrane and that this is due to the plasma treatment and not the preparation of the membrane or the result of storage under vacuum. These results are again different to Cho et al [6] who found an increase from 300 to 620 mW cm −2 when using ion bombarded Nafion in their MEAs. Our results could however explain the 'drastic' increase in performance Cha and Lee [13] observed when they first coated their Nafion membrane with a Nafion/carbon ink (NCI) prior to catalyst sputtering.…”
Section: Mea Performancecontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…The reduction in contact angle and unchanged surface roughness as a function of increasing energy dose is markedly different from the results obtained by Cho et al [6]. They used significantly higher energy doses with ion fluxes ranging from 1 × 10 15 to 1 × 10 17 ions cm −2 at 1 keV and found that measured contact angles actually increased with energy dose and gave a reference value of 80 • .…”
Section: Membrane Characterisationcontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The low cell performance should have been caused by a poor interface between the PEM and electrodes because chemical reaction takes place between catalysts and a PEM in hydrogen or oxygen [7]. Thus, by improving the interface between the PEM and electrodes, catalysts should be used more effectively to attain high cell performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%