1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(96)01088-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface movement errors in shank kinematics and knee kinetics during gait

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
96
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
8
96
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…30,31 The placement of the receivers in the current study was on the lateral side at onethird of the segment length from the distal end, where it would be less affected by soft tissue movement. [29][30][31][32] Several studies have also advised caution in interpreting the data in the transverse and frontal planes at the knee joint, as these are prone to greater inaccuracies due to soft tissue artefact than in the flexion-extension plane. [29][30][31][32] In the current study, rotation and abduction-adduction angles must also be considered subject to greater error than angles in the sagittal plane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…30,31 The placement of the receivers in the current study was on the lateral side at onethird of the segment length from the distal end, where it would be less affected by soft tissue movement. [29][30][31][32] Several studies have also advised caution in interpreting the data in the transverse and frontal planes at the knee joint, as these are prone to greater inaccuracies due to soft tissue artefact than in the flexion-extension plane. [29][30][31][32] In the current study, rotation and abduction-adduction angles must also be considered subject to greater error than angles in the sagittal plane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29][30][31][32] Several studies have also advised caution in interpreting the data in the transverse and frontal planes at the knee joint, as these are prone to greater inaccuracies due to soft tissue artefact than in the flexion-extension plane. [29][30][31][32] In the current study, rotation and abduction-adduction angles must also be considered subject to greater error than angles in the sagittal plane. However, most subjects had little excess soft tissue as indicated by their low mean body mass index (22.7 kg/m 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ionizing radiation given to the patient in our procedure is just a few hundredths of a mSv (considering a total of 22 images and an average dose of 0.001mSv for each image, we have a total dose of 0.02mSv, much lower than a 2.2mSv average dose absorbed with a CT) [30,31]. Compared to skin mounted markers, our system does not suffer from relative movements between the skin and the bone, and is thus suitable for accurate joint kinematics studies [6,7,8]. Our method proved to be stable without relying on implanted markers or joint implants, that will return more accurate results at the price of high invasiveness [5,9,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skin-mounted retro-reflective markers are used in gait analysis [6,7,8] using optical localization techniques. Since this type of measurement suffers from relative motion between the skin and the bone, results are not reliable to properly investigate joint kinematics.…”
Section: Fig8 : "Exted" -> "Extend"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Vicon (Vicon Motion Systems Ltd., UK) típu-sú rendszerek esetében a három tényező hatása jól dokumentált. [5][6][7] 1. ábra. a) marker; b) 3 marker integrációja egy markercsoport objektummá termined.…”
Section: Bevezetésunclassified