2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface nanobubbles on the rare earth fluorcarbonate mineral synchysite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some hints on this were found using AFM ( Figure 1 and Figure 2 , and Refs. [ 18 , 21 , 22 ]) and cryo-XPS [ 19 , 20 ]. The formation of nanobubbles on essentially oxidized hydrophilic surfaces seems to be suppressed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some hints on this were found using AFM ( Figure 1 and Figure 2 , and Refs. [ 18 , 21 , 22 ]) and cryo-XPS [ 19 , 20 ]. The formation of nanobubbles on essentially oxidized hydrophilic surfaces seems to be suppressed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, quasi in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies of the particulate sulfide minerals reacted with xanthate in the slurries, centrifuged and then fast-frozen [ 19 , 20 ], revealed charging effects attributed to cavities separating the hydrophobized mineral particles which may be signatures of gas structures arising on the surfaces under the flotation-related conditions. Owens and co-workers [ 21 , 22 ] have imaged, with non-contact atomic force microscopy, surface nanobubbles on polished cross sections of dolomite and rare earth fluorcarbonate mineral synchysite treated with flotation collectors inducing hydrophobicity of the minerals. Xing et al [ 23 ] have surveyed the hydrophobic force in particle–bubble attachment and concluded that the role of nanobubbles still remains to be identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The laboratory-based cryo-XPS has been successfully employed for exploration, among many others, of ion adsorption and electrical double layer structures [182,184], sulfur oxidation products of the reaction of goethite and lepidocrocite with aqueous sulfide [185], surfaces of chalcopyrite upon chemical and bacterial leaching [68,186], xanthate-derived collectors adsorbed on the main sulfide minerals [102,103], and other interfaces (see Figures 1 and 2 as examples). Interestingly, some signatures of surface nanobubbles, whose role in flotation is discussed at present [101,[186][187][188][189][190], were observed as highly inhomogeneous electrostatic charging of sulfide mineral particles reacted with butyl xanthates [102,103] probably due to widespread cavities and rare ice islets on the hydrophobic surfaces.…”
Section: Cryogenic Xpsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In a recent study, Owens et al (2019) used non-contact atomic force microscopy (NC-AFM) to image surface NBS on a lustrous cross-section taking rare earth minerals and indicated that the use of NBS to determine hydrophobicity is particularly applicable to highly complex ores with small particle sizes. Ren et al (2023) found that NBS not only reduces the amount of trapping agent used during flotation, but also improves the flotation and recovery of fine-grained cassiterite, and AFM showed results indicating that NBS can suppress the adsorption of caprylohydroxamic acid (CHA) on the mineral surface.…”
Section: Atomic Force Microscopy (Afm)mentioning
confidence: 99%