1970
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1970)81[3225:sposmc]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Patterns on Selected Mississippian Conodonts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34.5, 35.1); lower ('aboral') surfaces simply display ridges formed by lamellar terminations. Such a distribution has been reported for Polygnathus and Palmatolepis (Pierce & Lagenheim 1970) and for Siphonodella (Fig. IF-G), although it should be noted that some 'pitted' genera, for example Amorphognathus, are ornamented all over.…”
Section: Polygonal Pitting and Growth Of Siphonodellasupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…34.5, 35.1); lower ('aboral') surfaces simply display ridges formed by lamellar terminations. Such a distribution has been reported for Polygnathus and Palmatolepis (Pierce & Lagenheim 1970) and for Siphonodella (Fig. IF-G), although it should be noted that some 'pitted' genera, for example Amorphognathus, are ornamented all over.…”
Section: Polygonal Pitting and Growth Of Siphonodellasupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In summary, polygonal pit networks on brachiopod shells and vertebrate enamel both result from a morphological replication of the secreting epithelium. Hass (1941) and Pierce & Lagenheim (1970) suggested a similar relationship in the conodonts with mineralogic reproduction of organic tissue surfaces. Each pit does not necessarily represent an individual secreting cell, but rather a cell process or group of cells.…”
Section: Polygonal Pitting and Growth Of Siphonodellamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Novel studies generated by these findings include those utilizing polygonal surface microsculpture on conodont elements to measure the genome size (Conway Morris & Harper 1988) and others that used the distribution of the microsculpture to differentiate between functionally active and passive surfaces (Burnett 1988). These, and earlier (Haas 1941;Pierce & Langenheim 1970), studies regarded this microsculpture to be imprints of epithelial secreting cells, an unproven hypothesis. We demonstrate that the polygonal structures share important characteristics with (some) animal cells, that the hypothesis that they are the imprints of secreting epithelial cells is probably correct, and that these structures are important for interpreting conodont growth, function, histology and evolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…287-288. Oslo, 1994 03 21 Polygonal ornament in conodonts ANDREJ V. ZHURAVLEV Polygonal micro-ornamentation in platform conodont elements has been described in detail by Pierce & Langenheim (1970), Burnett (1988) and Conway Morris & Harper (1988). The latter authors interpreted the ornament as epithelial cell imprints and regarded the polygon size as proportional to the quantity of DNA in the cell nucleus.…”
Section: Lethaia Seminarmentioning
confidence: 99%