2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface plasmon resonance characterization of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies of malaria for biosensor applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to 'gold standard' microscopy, the immunosensor exhibited a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 90%. In another study that detected monoclonal antibodies to recombinant PfHRP-2 (MoaPfHRP-2), a gold chip was pre-treated with 4-mercaptobenzoic to immobilize recombinant PfHRP-2, then monitored for interactions between the antigen and antibody [68]. Label free surface plasmon resonance (SPR) screening of the interaction between the recombinant protein and target antibody produced a LoD of 5.6 pg (Table 2).…”
Section: Detection Of Pfhrp-2 In Clinical Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to 'gold standard' microscopy, the immunosensor exhibited a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 90%. In another study that detected monoclonal antibodies to recombinant PfHRP-2 (MoaPfHRP-2), a gold chip was pre-treated with 4-mercaptobenzoic to immobilize recombinant PfHRP-2, then monitored for interactions between the antigen and antibody [68]. Label free surface plasmon resonance (SPR) screening of the interaction between the recombinant protein and target antibody produced a LoD of 5.6 pg (Table 2).…”
Section: Detection Of Pfhrp-2 In Clinical Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawbacks of these techniques are that they are either of low sensitivity, which could lead to inappropriately withholding treatment from patients with malaria [ 19 ], or are as time consuming as the lab-based methods. Recent literature has reported the development of different sensors for malaria based on biomarker and antibody detection [ 24 , 25 ]. Therefore, in this work, we investigated the development of a rapid and highly sensitive sensor based on a screen-printed device, which would enable its use in low-resource countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waddington et al . demonstrated that the KD value of FX-Ad interaction was approximately 1.8 × 10 −9 M 24 , although the KD value of antigen-antibody interaction is generally reported as 10 −8 -10 −10 M 34 , 35 . These data indicated that the affinity of FX-Ad interaction was comparable to that of antigen-antibody interaction and that FX-Ad interaction was stable in the blood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%