2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118217498.ch14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Preparation of Alumina for Improved Adhesive Bond Strength in Armor Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,61 Therefore, dethatching and sliding of the adjacent surfaces are inhibited until the interface failure criterion, given by equation (19), is met: where S n is the interfacial normal stress strength and S s is the interfacial shear stress strength which were considered to be equal to 31 and 30 MPa, respectively. 33…”
Section: Fe Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…10,61 Therefore, dethatching and sliding of the adjacent surfaces are inhibited until the interface failure criterion, given by equation (19), is met: where S n is the interfacial normal stress strength and S s is the interfacial shear stress strength which were considered to be equal to 31 and 30 MPa, respectively. 33…”
Section: Fe Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of the ceramic to ceramic bonding interlayer affects the ballistic performance of the armor as well as the overall armor integrity. 29,33 For epoxy resin interlayer, higher ballistic performances are obtained for a thickness of 0. Ceramic laminated armors are presented in five (05) configurations.…”
Section: Monolithic Versus Laminated Ceramic Front Platesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chemical changes to the surface of the ceramic can be brought about by laser ablation and these changes have resulted in improved wettability . In previous research, these techniques were applied to alumina and silicon carbide, specifically for armor applications. Sets of samples for each surface preparation were tested quasi‐statically in tension and shear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%