2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface reconstruction and tissue recognition for robotic-based in situ bioprinting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental part was carried out using IMAGObot, a robotic biofabrication platform developed in a previous study. IMAGObot is a 5 DoF robotic arm designed starting from the open-source project MOVEO from BCN3D and re-engineered to be used for in situ bioprinting applications. IMAGObot is equipped with an electro-magnet as an end-effector allowing a fast and simple tool change to use different instruments during a single task . In this work, the photo-cross-linking device was integrated into the pneumatic-based EBB tool and used for bioprinting tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental part was carried out using IMAGObot, a robotic biofabrication platform developed in a previous study. IMAGObot is a 5 DoF robotic arm designed starting from the open-source project MOVEO from BCN3D and re-engineered to be used for in situ bioprinting applications. IMAGObot is equipped with an electro-magnet as an end-effector allowing a fast and simple tool change to use different instruments during a single task . In this work, the photo-cross-linking device was integrated into the pneumatic-based EBB tool and used for bioprinting tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the 3D printer having multiple degrees of freedom of various parts can help to minimize the side effects of invasive operation (Singh et al., 2020). A recent study reported surface reconstruction and mechanical evaluation of anatomical defects for robotic‐based in situ bioprinting applications (Fortunato et al., 2022). A touch probe as the end‐effector of a 5°‐of‐freedom https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/robotic-arm was developed in this device.…”
Section: Scaffold‐based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 e) [ 179 ]. The spatially conformal path generated based on planar path projections can also fulfill a similar purpose [ 122 , 180 , 181 ], while it is only appropriate for the printing of single-layered scaffolds ( Fig. 7 f).…”
Section: Integration With Clinical Procedures For In Vivo ...mentioning
confidence: 99%