2014 XXXIth URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium (URSI GASS) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ursigass.2014.6929620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface refractivity gradient data for radio system design

Abstract: Reliable information about the cumulative distribution of surface refractivity gradient is often required in the design of radio systems. Strong negative gradients, or super-refraction, may lead to interference between terrestrial stations, both terrestrial links and satellite earth stations. Predicted positive or sub-refractive gradients are taken into account in determining the minimum antenna heights, to ensure terrestrial links achieve their required availability. This paper reviews sources of refractivity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most significant predictor of fade depth A0.01% was found [27] to be a composite parameter v 1 , in terms of path length D (km), mean rayline height at standard refractivity gradient H 8500 , and N sA90−10 , the interdecile range of the time-series of surface refractivity anomaly N sA [24]: v1=(NsA90100.3)(D0.5)H85000.25.…”
Section: Examples Of Gls With Regular and Irregularly Sampled Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most significant predictor of fade depth A0.01% was found [27] to be a composite parameter v 1 , in terms of path length D (km), mean rayline height at standard refractivity gradient H 8500 , and N sA90−10 , the interdecile range of the time-series of surface refractivity anomaly N sA [24]: v1=(NsA90100.3)(D0.5)H85000.25.…”
Section: Examples Of Gls With Regular and Irregularly Sampled Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, we may imagine this problem being solved by numerical weather prediction (NWP) estimating the state of the lower atmosphere with sufficient resolution, of the order of 1 m vertically, and accuracy, to predict the radio propagation with a technique such as the parabolic equation model [23]. However NWP models do not yet have sufficient resolution, or accuracy in many locations [24], so empirical regression models are used. The current accepted prediction model [25] is an OLS estimate from a number of climatic and physical parameters [26].…”
Section: Radio Climate Modelling In Two Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%