1990
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.64.1405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface roughening in a hypercube-stacking model

Abstract: We study in J +1 dimensions a new deposition and evaporation model of a J-dimensional surface which bears a Potts-spin representation. For the pure deposition case, our simulations on systems up to 11 520^ sites in d'^2 and 2x192^ sites in t/^S yield roughness exponents which violate recent conjectures. Including evaporation, we observe a nonequilibrium surface-roughening transition in d'^3, but only a smooth crossover behavior in t/ -2. A logarithmic anomalous scaling form for surface width at the transition … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
125
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
15
125
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9 in that paper. Interestingly, the 2+1 KPZ stationary-state has also permitted a solid multi-model (gDPRM,RSOS,KPZ Euler) estimate β 2+1 =0.241(1), in line with prior gold-medal studies [20,124] at the 3-digit precision level.…”
Section: Universal Limit Distribution: 3d Radial Kpz Classmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…9 in that paper. Interestingly, the 2+1 KPZ stationary-state has also permitted a solid multi-model (gDPRM,RSOS,KPZ Euler) estimate β 2+1 =0.241(1), in line with prior gold-medal studies [20,124] at the 3-digit precision level.…”
Section: Universal Limit Distribution: 3d Radial Kpz Classmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…• Recalling recent 2+1 DPRM results [84], which have isolated the higher-dimensional analog of KPZ/TW-GOE, measuring s=0.424 and k=0.346 for the generic pt-plane case, and pinned down the key index ω 2+1 =0.241 [20,124] via a multi-model study [85] of 2+1 KPZ stationary-state statistics, we notice quite similar values for the b=2.3 ♦DPRM, where the exponent, 0.274, might be a little high, but the skewness, 0.423, and kurtosis, 0.372, certainly close to the mark. Given our findings above for the ♦DPRM sk relation, one cannot resist looking at Euclidean KPZ from this same vantage point.…”
Section: The Many-dimensional Dprm and Fate Of D=∞ Kpzmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the two dimensional case, the values of the exponents are ν ≃ 2/3 , ω ≃ 1/3, and the values 2/3 and 1/3 are considered to be exact. In dimensions higher then 2, there are only numerical estimates for the values of the exponents, and in the three and four dimensional cases, the accepted values for the exponents are ν ≃ 0.62, ω ≃ 0.24, and ν ≃ 0.59, ω ≃ 0.18 respectively [10,11]. However, these numerical estimates were obtained for random values taken from Gaussian distribution, while non-Gaussian distributions, though preserving the space exponents [11], yield lower estimates for the energy exponents [5,11].…”
Section: 40-amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent Letter, Newman and Swift [1] made an interesting suggestion that the strong-coupling exponents of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang [2] (KPZ) equation reported previously [3,4] may not be universal, but rather depend on the precise form of the noise distribution. The purpose of this Comment is to show that their numerical findings can be attributed to a percolative effect instead of a portentous breakdown of universality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%