1953
DOI: 10.1021/j150505a016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Roughness as Related to Hysteresis of Contact Angles. III. The Systems Paraffin–Ethylene Glycol–Air, Paraffin–Methyl Cellosolve–Air and Paraffin–Methanol–Air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20,28,42 The Cassie−Baxter equation, frequently used to estimate apparent contact angles, does not reflect the underlying physical process 43,44 nor does it produce accurate estimates. 2,[17][18][19]28,43,44 ■ CONCLUSIONS Videos captured with confocal microscopy by Butt and coworkers confirm earlier claims that water advances across pillared super-hydrophobic surfaces with an apparent contact angle of 180°. By adapting an existing model that assumes linear averaging along the contact line, it was possible to accurately estimate apparent contact angles and sliding angles for their surfaces.…”
Section: ■ Modelsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…20,28,42 The Cassie−Baxter equation, frequently used to estimate apparent contact angles, does not reflect the underlying physical process 43,44 nor does it produce accurate estimates. 2,[17][18][19]28,43,44 ■ CONCLUSIONS Videos captured with confocal microscopy by Butt and coworkers confirm earlier claims that water advances across pillared super-hydrophobic surfaces with an apparent contact angle of 180°. By adapting an existing model that assumes linear averaging along the contact line, it was possible to accurately estimate apparent contact angles and sliding angles for their surfaces.…”
Section: ■ Modelsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Confocal microscopy confirmed that drops were suspended atop the pillars. At the advancing edge, the water interface descended downward and flattened across the pillars, effectively producing an apparent advancing contact angle (θ apa ) of 180°, as previously anticipated. ,− Locally the advancing contact angle sometimes exceeded 180° due to curvature of the air–water interface at the pillars, reaching values as high as 188° . (As an aside, Butt and co-workers’ measurements with a goniometer equipped with a camera and drop shape analysis software gave a “low” value of θ apa = 165 ± 3°.…”
Section: Experimental Observationsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we name θ d the contact angle of the liquid on the chemical defect, a Cassie-Baxter approach [34] leads to ϵ max ¼ Φ max ½ðcos θ 0 − cos θ d Þ= cos θ 0 . Using advancing contact angles measured from the experimental force curves in the stationary state for θ 0 and values of advancing contact angles on paraffin wax (to mimic hydrocarbons) from the literature for θ d [35][36][37][38], we show in Table I that the experimental and calculated values of ϵ max agree reasonably for Φ max ¼ 0.07. Assuming dominant contaminant molecules as short hydrocarbon chains [30] with size d ∼ 0.25 nm, we estimate the maximum coverage to about one molecule per nm 2 of the surface.…”
Section: Molecular Desorption By a Moving Contact Linementioning
confidence: 83%
“…This equality only holds for the specific form of the S ( K ) operator: (9) With these assumptions the effective Hamiltonian operator of Eq.…”
Section: Intermediate Normalization Imposedmentioning
confidence: 99%