2005
DOI: 10.1115/1.1860377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Roughness Effects on Turbine Blade Aerodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study of El-Batsh and Haselbacher [4], an increase in the total pressure loss coefficient of about 0.03 was observed only after 36 hours of working of turbine blades in a cascade due to fouling of ash particles suspended in the inlet air. Hummel et al [5] studied the aerodynamic performance of a turbine blade through measurements of total pressure loss on a linear cascade. In this study, the Reynolds number was chosen between 0.6  10 6 and 1.2  10 6 to capture the operating condition for heavy-duty gas turbines.…”
Section: Experimental Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of El-Batsh and Haselbacher [4], an increase in the total pressure loss coefficient of about 0.03 was observed only after 36 hours of working of turbine blades in a cascade due to fouling of ash particles suspended in the inlet air. Hummel et al [5] studied the aerodynamic performance of a turbine blade through measurements of total pressure loss on a linear cascade. In this study, the Reynolds number was chosen between 0.6  10 6 and 1.2  10 6 to capture the operating condition for heavy-duty gas turbines.…”
Section: Experimental Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, an experimental test was presented by Hummel et al [28] to evaluate the aerodynamic performance of a rough blade surface. Four different heights of surface roughness were added for a Reynolds number range from 60 × 10 4 to 120 × 10 4 .…”
Section: Experimental Studies On the Effect Of Wind Turbine Blade Surmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high roughness of the blade surface leads to earlier boundary layer transition [6], increase in friction factor [7], decrease in heat transfer efficiency [8] and total pressure [9]. Boynton, et al [10] reported that smooth blades yield a turbine efficiency of 87.92%.Compared with rough blades, this was a 2.5% improvement of the efficiency, which reduced the turbine inlet temperature by 32 K and increased turbine durability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%