2001
DOI: 10.1080/10402000108982425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Roughness Model for Worn Inserts of Face Milling: Part I — Factors that Affect Arithmetic Surface Roughness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note: Case 1 analysis above is identical to that reported in previous research [16], shown in Equations (32) and (33).…”
Section: Of 14supporting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Note: Case 1 analysis above is identical to that reported in previous research [16], shown in Equations (32) and (33).…”
Section: Of 14supporting
confidence: 52%
“…Equation (34) should not be used for high feed rates, but this limitation is not given in [19]. = 0.0321 Gu et al [16] derived a model to predict the mean roughness under an assumption of perfect round insert, see Equations (32) and (33).…”
Section: Comparison Of Mathematical Model and Experimental Surface Romentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Often, the surface roughness of a mechanical component determines its functionality in the range of its intended use [ 25 , 26 ]. The values of surface roughness parameters mainly depend on the cutting process parameters [ 27 ] and the cutting edge geometry, which is taken into account by models predicting the values of these parameters [ 28 , 29 , 30 ]. The surface roughness also depends on the relative position of the face milling tool towards the workpiece [ 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%