2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2014.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface roughness of rock faces through the curvature of triangulated meshes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, generally convex features, such as stalactites, stalagmites, or pendants, have positive mean curvature values while concave features, such as sinks, cavities, half tubes, or sinks have negative values. Lai et al (2014) used the curvature of a 3-D mesh as a measure of the surface roughness of rock faces.…”
Section: Analysing the Cave Surface Using 3-d Geomorphometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, generally convex features, such as stalactites, stalagmites, or pendants, have positive mean curvature values while concave features, such as sinks, cavities, half tubes, or sinks have negative values. Lai et al (2014) used the curvature of a 3-D mesh as a measure of the surface roughness of rock faces.…”
Section: Analysing the Cave Surface Using 3-d Geomorphometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few decades, a range of microtopographic data collection methods have been used in rock breakdown and soil erosion studies. These include (1) laser scanning techniques (Fardin et al, 2001(Fardin et al, , 2004Bourke et al, 2007;Bourke et al, 2008;Aguilar et al, 2009;Sturzenegger and Stead, 2009;MŁynarczuk, 2010;Medapati et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2014;Ge et al, 2014;Lai et al, 2014), (2) stereophotogrammetry (Rieke-Zapp and Nearing, 2005;Taconet and Ciarletti, 2007;Aguilar et al, 2009;Bui et al, 2009;Sturzenegger and Stead, 2009;Kim et al, 2015), and (3) micro-roughness meters (MRMs) (McCarroll, 1992;Mc-Carroll and Nesje, 1996;White et al, 1998). However, there are significant logistical, technical, and, for some, financial constraints that have hindered the adoption of these methods, particularly in physically challenging terrains such as remote, difficult to access, and steep terrains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the resolution, precision, and accuracy of MRM (∼ 0.001 to 0.005 mm) is higher than laser scanning and photogrammetry techniques (sub-millimetre to millimetre), the topographic data obtained from MRM are two-dimensional and limit the analysis to the calculation of profile roughness parameters. The profile roughness parameters only provide information along a profile, not the entire rock surface, which often makes it difficult to determine the exact nature of a topographic feature (Leach, 2013). In comparison, 3-D data from laser scanners and photogrammetry enable the calculation of areal surface roughness parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Animal-scale 3D environmental models collected from free-ranging individuals have great potential to be used in the measurement of ground inclination, obstacle detection, and derivation of various surface roughness or traversability indexes (e.g. [53][54][55]). Such variables could then be examined in relation to accelerometer-derived proxies of energy expenditure to further our understanding of the 'energetic envelope' [51] within which an animal may optimise its behavioural patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%