“…Simpler models have been used to better be able to address the fundamental chemistry involved, following a so-called modern surface science approach. Well-defined surfaces, single crystal or polycrystalline disks of the main metal in this case, are placed in well-controlled environments, namely, ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) conditions, to be able to use a battery of surface-sensitive techniques such as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), low-energy electron diffraction (LEED), − scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), ,,, temperature-programmed desorption (TPD), ,,, and reflection–absorption infrared absorption spectroscopy (RAIRS), ,,− to extract molecular details on the adsorption and reactivity of the reactants and modifiers. ,, This approach has provided much insight into the surface chiral chemistry involved, but is limited by the simplicity of the systems used, which do not include the solvent present under catalytic conditions (a fact referred to as the “pressure gap”), − and ignores the characteristics of realistic catalysts, where the metal is present as small nanoparticles (NPs) dispersed on a high-surface-area support, typically an oxide such as silica or alumina (the “materials gap”). ,− …”