Surface and Interface Science 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9783527680573.ch39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Science Approach to Heterogeneous Catalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 313 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted that studies on model catalysts comprising carbon supports are relatively rare compared to oxides. [1313][1314][1315] In this review article, we were interested in compiling and discussing the most significant experimental and theoretical results allowing a better understanding of key phenomena in catalysis as: i) the anchoring of the metal; ii) the metal-support interactions (geometric effects, charge transfer); iii) confinement; iv) spillover; or v) surface functional group effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that studies on model catalysts comprising carbon supports are relatively rare compared to oxides. [1313][1314][1315] In this review article, we were interested in compiling and discussing the most significant experimental and theoretical results allowing a better understanding of key phenomena in catalysis as: i) the anchoring of the metal; ii) the metal-support interactions (geometric effects, charge transfer); iii) confinement; iv) spillover; or v) surface functional group effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simpler models have been used to better be able to address the fundamental chemistry involved, following a so-called modern surface science approach. Well-defined surfaces, single crystal or polycrystalline disks of the main metal in this case, are placed in well-controlled environments, namely, ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) conditions, to be able to use a battery of surface-sensitive techniques such as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), low-energy electron diffraction (LEED), scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), ,,, temperature-programmed desorption (TPD), ,,, and reflection–absorption infrared absorption spectroscopy (RAIRS), ,, to extract molecular details on the adsorption and reactivity of the reactants and modifiers. ,, This approach has provided much insight into the surface chiral chemistry involved, but is limited by the simplicity of the systems used, which do not include the solvent present under catalytic conditions (a fact referred to as the “pressure gap”), and ignores the characteristics of realistic catalysts, where the metal is present as small nanoparticles (NPs) dispersed on a high-surface-area support, typically an oxide such as silica or alumina (the “materials gap”). , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many years, the surface science approach to heterogeneous catalysis was restricted to gas pressures of 10 −6 mbar and below, giving rise to the well-known “pressure gap” problem [ 1 – 3 ]. This limitation was overcome when surface-sensitive methods (or modes thereof) were developed that could be operated at least in the mbar pressure range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%