2015
DOI: 10.1364/ao.54.005411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface shape evaluation with a corneal topographer based on a conical null-screen with a novel radial point distribution

Abstract: In order to measure the shape of fast convex aspherics, such as the corneal surface of the human eye, we propose the design of a conical null-screen with a radial point distribution (spots similar to ellipses) drawn on it in such a way that its image, which is formed by reflection on the test surface, becomes an exact array of circular spots if the surface is perfect. Any departure from this geometry is indicative of defects on the evaluated surface. We present the target array design and the surface evaluatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, these works have paved the way for quantitative evaluations (Rayces, 1964;Salas-Peimbert et al, 2005). There exists considerable freedom to choose the shapes of static reference patterns, sometimes designed as "null screens" (Carmona-Paredes and Díaz-Uribe, 2007): in addition to generic planes (Díaz-Uribe, 2000), also cylinders (Díaz-Uribe and Campos-García, 2000;Campos-García et al, 2004), cones (Campos-García et al, 2015b;Campos-García et al, 2022), boxes (Campos-García et al, 2011), rings (Quach et al, 2022a) and custom geometries (Pérard, 2001) have been used. One may assemble points or lines into 1D or 2D arrays; otherwise, one may use rectangular, Gaussian or sinusoidal intensity profiles.…”
Section: Historical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, these works have paved the way for quantitative evaluations (Rayces, 1964;Salas-Peimbert et al, 2005). There exists considerable freedom to choose the shapes of static reference patterns, sometimes designed as "null screens" (Carmona-Paredes and Díaz-Uribe, 2007): in addition to generic planes (Díaz-Uribe, 2000), also cylinders (Díaz-Uribe and Campos-García, 2000;Campos-García et al, 2004), cones (Campos-García et al, 2015b;Campos-García et al, 2022), boxes (Campos-García et al, 2011), rings (Quach et al, 2022a) and custom geometries (Pérard, 2001) have been used. One may assemble points or lines into 1D or 2D arrays; otherwise, one may use rectangular, Gaussian or sinusoidal intensity profiles.…”
Section: Historical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, these works have paved the way for quantitative evaluations [149,150]. There exists a considerable freedom to choose the shapes of static reference patterns [151]: in addition to generic planes [152], also cylinders [153,154], cones [155,156], boxes [157], and custom geometries [158] have been used. One may assemble points or lines into 1D or 2D arrays; otherwise, one may use rectangular, Gaussian or sinusoidal intensity profiles.…”
Section: Historical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The National Autonomous University of Mexico has a history of developing corneal topography equipment using the nullscreen method [5][6][7] . This method consists of a set of dots placed in a structure in such a way that, given thier reflection on a test surface, the image obtained consists of a perfect array of the spots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%