2020
DOI: 10.1177/1081286520902507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface, size and topological effects for some nematic equilibria on rectangular domains

Abstract: We study nematic equilibria on rectangular domains, in a reduced two-dimensional Landau–de Gennes framework. These reduced equilibria carry over to the three-dimensional framework at a special temperature. There is one essential model variable, [Formula: see text], which is a geometry-dependent and material-dependent variable. We compute the limiting profiles exactly in two distinguished limits: the [Formula: see text] 0 limit relevant for macroscopic domains and the [Formula: see text] limit relevant for nano… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathematically, this limit is much simpler than the → 0 limit, since we lose the nemato-magnetic coupling in this limit. Referring to [41], the leading order equations, in this limit, are: ). In the Q 1 plot, the corresponding vector n 1 in ( 13) is represented by white lines and the order parameter subject to the Dirichlet conditions (10).…”
Section: Solution Landscape On a Squarementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mathematically, this limit is much simpler than the → 0 limit, since we lose the nemato-magnetic coupling in this limit. Referring to [41], the leading order equations, in this limit, are: ). In the Q 1 plot, the corresponding vector n 1 in ( 13) is represented by white lines and the order parameter subject to the Dirichlet conditions (10).…”
Section: Solution Landscape On a Squarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is precisely the solution along the Ring branch for large , in the bifurcation diagrams Figures 1 and 3, which is the unique energy minimizer in this limit. Following the methods in [41], the limiting solution, (Q ∞ , M ∞ ) of ( 26) is an excellent approximation to the solutions, Q , M of (6)-( 9), for fixed c, subject to the same boundary conditions, for large enough i.e.,…”
Section: Solution Landscape On a Squarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose this temperature, partly for comparison with previous work in [16] and [9], and partly because for this special temperature, solutions in the rLdG model also exist as solutions for the full LdG model in 3D i.e. the minimizers of the rLdG model at A = −B 2 /3C will exist as critical points of the full LdG free energy in 3D settings, for suitably defined boundary conditions.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematically, this limit is much simpler than the → 0 limit, since we lose the nemato-magnetic coupling in this limit. Referring to [41], the leading order equations, in this limit, are:…”
Section: Solution Landscape On a Squarementioning
confidence: 99%