2010
DOI: 10.3367/ufnr.0180.201007b.0709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface spin-flop transition in an antiferromagnet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately the measurements in T-geometry have been done only at the selected field values (at 0, 50, 600 and 1500 Oe), and with the anther piece of the same sample in order to avoid the remanent magnetization effects after the first cycle of the magnetic field application (Figs. 11,13). The angular delayed curve and time spectra of reflectivity at zero external field are good fitted with the same hyperfine parameter and B hf orientations (20 o /-160 o ) which according to (41) At 50 Oe the fit results for two geometries are slightly different (Fig.…”
Section: The Results Of the External Field Influencementioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately the measurements in T-geometry have been done only at the selected field values (at 0, 50, 600 and 1500 Oe), and with the anther piece of the same sample in order to avoid the remanent magnetization effects after the first cycle of the magnetic field application (Figs. 11,13). The angular delayed curve and time spectra of reflectivity at zero external field are good fitted with the same hyperfine parameter and B hf orientations (20 o /-160 o ) which according to (41) At 50 Oe the fit results for two geometries are slightly different (Fig.…”
Section: The Results Of the External Field Influencementioning
confidence: 76%
“…The theories so far developed [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] present a rather complicated picture of the layer-by-layer reorientation in the antiferromagnetic MLs under the applied field, however in some papers the evolution of the layer magnetization vectors is treated with the assumption that magnetizations in all even and in all odd magnetic layers are collinear in other words the reorientation of each magnetic sublattice takes place cophasingly. So the process of reorientation under the external field could be described just by two azimuth angles: each one for separate magnetic sublattice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some systems the 90 o initial orientation of the two magnetic sub-systems have been discovered [11][12][13][14], supported by the bilinear-biquadratic formalism or specific proximity magnetism model ( [15][16], and review [8]). However, the theoretical modeling and the more sophisticated experimental techniques, giving the depth resolved magnetization profiles, like polarized neutron reflectivity (PNR) or nuclear resonance reflectivity (NRR), present a more complicated picture of the depth resolved magnetization reorientations including the layer-by-layer twisting of the magnetization in each magnetic sub-systems [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the obtained interface quality and possible impurities essentially influence the IEC (see e.g. [17,[23][24][25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%