1984
DOI: 10.1016/0008-6223(84)90082-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface structure and electrical conductivity of natural and artificial graphites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4C. We find a significant change in conductivity anisotropy with porosity, increasing from~25 at P~0.7 to >1000 at very low porosity, with the latter value in line with that expected for HOPG [71]. This increase in anisotropy as porosity is decreased is, of course, a direct result of the platelet alignment observed in Fig.…”
Section: Conductivity Anisotropysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…4C. We find a significant change in conductivity anisotropy with porosity, increasing from~25 at P~0.7 to >1000 at very low porosity, with the latter value in line with that expected for HOPG [71]. This increase in anisotropy as porosity is decreased is, of course, a direct result of the platelet alignment observed in Fig.…”
Section: Conductivity Anisotropysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, the isolation of graphene initiated significant advances in preparation of high-quality graphite samples using mechanical exfoliation. [35][36][37] Surprisingly, the fundamental electrochemistry of natural crystalline graphite has barely been explored (with the exception of ionic intercalation) and much of what is understood about basal/edge plane electroactivity has been learned from experiments on HOPG. Mechanical exfoliation of natural graphite, however, can now yield single-crystal monoand multi-layer flakes reaching millimetre lateral dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific dissimilarities are the high step edge density, imperfect layer stacking and rotational disorder of polycrystalline HOPG, 6,34 in comparison to the large crystallite sizes and ordered stacking of the highest-quality natural graphite crystals. [35][36][37] Surprisingly, the fundamental electrochemistry of natural crystalline graphite has barely been explored (with the exception of ionic intercalation) and much of what is understood about basal/edge plane electroactivity has been learned from experiments on HOPG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(= 0.22 S cm À1 )] of electric conductivity of a layered graphite monocrystal exceeding 10 5 . [1] Consequently, it has remained a significant challenge to develop large dielectric anisotropy (defined as De = e k Àe ? or Fe = e k /e ?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative dielectric constant ε r varies little with anisotropy, with the largest known anisotropic ratio approaching a value less than 10 2 and which either sharply drops to 1–2 orders of magnitude or almost vanishes between two different directions with increasing phase‐transition temperature. In contrast, conductivity is a strong function of direction and the best known example of this is the large anisotropic ratio [ δ ∥ (=222 700 S cm −1 )/ δ ⊥(=0.22 S cm −1 )] of electric conductivity of a layered graphite monocrystal exceeding 10 5 1. Consequently, it has remained a significant challenge to develop large dielectric anisotropy (defined as Δ ε = ε ∥ − ε ⊥ or Φε = ε ∥ / ε ⊥ , in which ε ∥ or ε ⊥ is the real part of the complex permittivity ε = ε r + iε a , and one of the most important physical properties of liquid crystalline compounds that in essence determine the lower threshold voltage of liquid crystal displays (LCDs) 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%