2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2005.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface structure and energetics of oxygen and CO adsorption on α-Mo2C(0001)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
32
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
9
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This large discrepancy, as well as the smaller discrepancies for lattice constants and bulk modulus, are consistent with the known error trends of the RBPE functional for bulk systems [62]. Previous studies of Mo 2 C with generalized gradient functionals have resulted in lattice constants within 0.5% [45], bulk modulii within 0.1% [48], and formation energies within 9% [39] of reported experimental values. This indicates that the generalized gradient approximation provides an accurate description of the electronic structure of Mo 2 C. The RPBE functional is used for this study since it provides an improved description of the adsorption properties of surfaces [58].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This large discrepancy, as well as the smaller discrepancies for lattice constants and bulk modulus, are consistent with the known error trends of the RBPE functional for bulk systems [62]. Previous studies of Mo 2 C with generalized gradient functionals have resulted in lattice constants within 0.5% [45], bulk modulii within 0.1% [48], and formation energies within 9% [39] of reported experimental values. This indicates that the generalized gradient approximation provides an accurate description of the electronic structure of Mo 2 C. The RPBE functional is used for this study since it provides an improved description of the adsorption properties of surfaces [58].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The reactivity of each site was examined for carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. Each atomic adsorbate followed a similar trend with the H C(l) site showing the highest reactivity in agreement with several previous studies [45,46,49,40]. The specific adsorption energies for carbon and oxygen are shown in Figure 1(c).…”
Section: Mo 2 C(001) Surfacesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous results for the H adsorption on this surface indicated that H adsorbs more strongly to the metal-terminated carbide surface than to the C-terminated surface [23]. Also Ren et al [29] found adsorption energies for O and CO 37 and 31% higher on Mo-terminated than on C-terminated surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…On the other hand, it has been found that the peaks at 0.4, 4.1 and 5.3 eV do not show dispersions as a function of hn, and thus the initial states should be ascribed to the states localized to the oxygen-covered surface [6]. The states at 4.1 and 5.3 eVare ascribed to the O 2p-induced bonding states, which have been theoretically predicted to exist around 5 eV by Ren et al [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%