2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.63.235402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface structure of anataseTiO2(001):Reconstruction, atomic steps, and domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
88
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
10
88
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, previous experimental studies in the literature generally agreed in assigning the 2163-2164 cm -1 band to the CO/(001) system. 19,20 However, our results suggest that at high CO coverage: -the regular (001) facets should not contribute to signals characterized by wavenumbers higher than 2134 cm -1 (ESI , Table S2c); -only CO adsorbed on reconstructed (001) surfaces [the (1x4) reconstruction is well known to occur for this type of surface 66,67 ] might contribute (at the tail) to the 2160-2150 cm -1 region.…”
Section: Theoretical Modeling Of Co Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Interestingly, previous experimental studies in the literature generally agreed in assigning the 2163-2164 cm -1 band to the CO/(001) system. 19,20 However, our results suggest that at high CO coverage: -the regular (001) facets should not contribute to signals characterized by wavenumbers higher than 2134 cm -1 (ESI , Table S2c); -only CO adsorbed on reconstructed (001) surfaces [the (1x4) reconstruction is well known to occur for this type of surface 66,67 ] might contribute (at the tail) to the 2160-2150 cm -1 region.…”
Section: Theoretical Modeling Of Co Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…All TiO 2 single crystal surfaces exhibit sharp LEED patterns with the dotted rectangular indicating the reciprocal unit cell. Agreeing with previous reports, [27][28][29] the LEED pattern of clean TiO 2 A-(001) surface exhibits two domains corresponding to (1×4) and (4×1) reconstructions respectively in the [100] and [010] directions, and the resulting TiO 2 A-(001)-(1×4) surface exposes the fourfold-coordinated Ti atoms (Ti 4c ) at the ridge, the fivefold-coordinated Ti atoms (Ti 5c ) at the terrace and the twofold-coordinated O atoms (O 2c ). The clean TiO 2 R-(110) surface does not reconstruct and exposes alternating rows of Ti 5c and O 2c atoms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…surfaces could be attributed to the fact that the rutile TiO 2 surfaces are more easily reduced than the anatase surfaces and thus exhibit a better conductivity. [28] Thus it is likely that the A-(001)-(1×4) surface suffers from the charging effect during the XPS measurement. Figure 3 compares the TDS spectra of methanol adsorption on various clean TiO 2 single crystal surfaces at 115 K. Only the methanol desorption trace was observed for all surfaces.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under identical optimized MBE growth conditions, whether anatase or rutile nucleates depends entirely on the substrate; rutile (100) forms on a-Al 2 O 3 (001) whereas anatase (001) nucleates on SrTiO 3 (001), LaAlO 3 (001), and other perovskite substrates. [99,100,[203][204][205][206][207][208][209][210][211][212] In all cases, there are twodimensional symmetry matches between substrate and film in the growth plane, and some similarity in the in-plane lattice parameters. As expected, rutile also exclusively nucleates on rutile (110), (001), and (100) substrates.…”
Section: Molecular Beam Epitaxymentioning
confidence: 99%