1998
DOI: 10.1021/jp981550a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Studies of Polymer Blends by Sum Frequency Vibrational Spectroscopy, Atomic Force Microscopy, and Contact Angle Goniometry

Abstract: The surface composition, surface structure, and wetting properties of a polymer blend were studied by a combination of surface-sensitive techniques:  IR + visible sum-frequency generation vibrational spectroscopy (SFG), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and contact angle goniometry. The polymer blend studied is composed of Biospan-S (BS) and a phenoxy base polymer (BP). BS is a polyurethane, capped with poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) end groups, and has a water contact angle of 94°. BP is more hydrophilic with a w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
53
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On a bulk polymer level, there were no major differences in wettability, and all polymers exhibited a mixed hydrophobic and hydrophilic nature. 52 This is supported by our XPS and polymer degradation results, as enrichment of fluorine on the film or fiber surface would likely cause an observable increase in hydrophobicity and slower degradation; however, the polymers did not exhibit differences in wettability or degradation. In particular, our PLGA-based biodegradable PU all degraded more quickly than previously reported PCL-based polyurethanes 26,53,54 and showed <20% mass remaining after 4 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…On a bulk polymer level, there were no major differences in wettability, and all polymers exhibited a mixed hydrophobic and hydrophilic nature. 52 This is supported by our XPS and polymer degradation results, as enrichment of fluorine on the film or fiber surface would likely cause an observable increase in hydrophobicity and slower degradation; however, the polymers did not exhibit differences in wettability or degradation. In particular, our PLGA-based biodegradable PU all degraded more quickly than previously reported PCL-based polyurethanes 26,53,54 and showed <20% mass remaining after 4 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…A review on SFG studies of polymer surfaces and interfaces was published in 2002 [7] which mainly summarized SFG research of polymer surface structures in air and water. For example, SFG has been extensively applied to study many different polymers in air, such as polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP) [9,10], polymethacrylates [11,12], polystyrene (PS) [13,14], polyimide [15], polyvinyl alcohol [16,17], Teflon [18], various polymer blends [1922], copolymers [23], and polymer surfaces after modification [2427]. Such research will not be discussed in this article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the many methods for modifying the surface properties, polymer blending is considered one of the simplest methods for obtaining the desirable surface characteristics by controlling the surface morphology and wettability [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and commercially available polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) have been studied extensively as blending components [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Polymer surfaces with extremely low surface energies are used widely in electric and biomedical applications [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%