2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2012.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface tension of an ethane–nitrogen solution. 1: Experiment and thermodynamic analysis of the results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, we do not see a single molecule of ethane in the vapor phase over the time scale of our simulations. Our results for surface tension values are in quantitative agreement with the experimental data for both nitrogen–methane and nitrogen–ethane systems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, we do not see a single molecule of ethane in the vapor phase over the time scale of our simulations. Our results for surface tension values are in quantitative agreement with the experimental data for both nitrogen–methane and nitrogen–ethane systems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Solubility of nitrogen increases as the mole fraction of methane in the mixture increases, while the surface tension decreases upon increasing the mole fraction of methane. Our values of surface tension agree well with the experimental values. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…ST of systems nitrogen (1)–methane (2), nitrogen (1)–ethane (2), nitrogen (1)– n -pentane (2), and nitrogen (1)– n -hexane (2). Points, experimental data. Lines, predictions of the proposed approach ( k 12 = 0.05, β = 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure surface tension, use was made of the differential variation of the method of capillary rise (Baidakov, 1994;Baidakov et al, 2012) of capillaries with different inner radii were used in the experiments. The capillary radii were determined by calibration with mercury and had the following values: r 1 = (0.2310 ± 0.0003) mm, r 2 = (0.1253 ± 0.0005) mm, r 3 = (0.06508 ± 0.00009) mm (assembly I) and r 1 = (0.6393 ± 0.0005) mm, r 2 = (0.2297 ± 0.0003) mm, r 3 = (0.09607 ± 0.00008) mm (assembly II).…”
Section: Procedures Of Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%